Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 336

ORDER granting 227 Sealed Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories; granting in part 285 Sealed Motion to Compel Production of Documents; granting in part and denying in part 286 Sealed Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ted E. Bandstra on 4/24/2012. (ra)

UNI
TED STATES DI
STRI COURT
CT
SOUTHERN DI
STRI O F FLO RI
CT
DA
CASE NO.1023580- VCI SCOLY BANDSTRA

M OTORO LA M O BI TY,I ,
LI
NC.
Cljntf,
lëi i
f

APPLE I ,
NC.
Def
endant
.

/

APPLE I .
NC ,
Count cl m Pl ntf,
er ai ai if

M oTo Ro LA,l . and
Nc

MoToRoL MoBilY,Nc.
.
A
LT l ,
Count cl m Def
er ai
endant
s.
/

ORDER

THI CAusE cam ebef et
S
or hecoudont ol i pr ral scovew m otonsfl
hef l ng et i di
ow
i i
ed
byt padi i t above- i
he
es n he
captoned case.Upon r ew oft
evi
hese m otons,aI r
i
l esponses
and r i t et t coud fl and applcabl I i i her
epl her o, he
es
i
e
i e aw, t s eby
O RDERED AND ADJUDGED asf l
ol
ows:

1.Appl Ic. ( ed) tont Comp Res on est lt r t i Regar n
e n ' Seal Mo i o
s
el p s o n eroga or
es
dig

ed
anua y 31,201 i GRANTED
r
2s
Se - p Bo Pa en s ( .1 22)( E.2 fl on J
tTo x t t Nos 9- D. 27) i
consi entwih t s Coud' Febr y 24,2012 Or addr ng t s m ater
st
t hi
s
uar
der
essi hi
t .

2. pl lc. I ed Mo i t Comp Pr duci of umen san Te t
Ap e,n ' seal ) t o
s
on
el o ton Doc
t d si
mony

Reg di SetTop BoxComp en s( E. 5)fed on Mar h 2 201 i GRANTED I
ar ng on t D. 28 i
l
c 7, 2 s
N
PART, he Coud fndi t Appl s Requestf Pr
t
i ng hat
e'
or oducton Nos.5 & 6 seek i or aton
i
nf m i

whih i r ev t o t e s j t tero t i ac i Specf l t e Courfn t tt e
c s el an t h ubec mat f hs t
on.
ical h
i y,
t ids ha h
i or i r di t stuct e ofi egr ed cicuis cont ned i accused M ot ol
nf maton egar ng he r ur
nt at
r t
ai
n
or a

Pr ducs icu n Br adc doc
o t n ldig o om
umen a i an Bis o Maer s (BOM' f r s ch
t ton d l f t i '
l
al ' ' o u
)
accus M ot ol pr
ed
or a oduct ar r
s e esponsi t t
ve o hese i erogat i l vi oft padi
nt r ores. n ew he
es'
cont pl ed stpul i r di t spr
em at
i aton egar ng hi oducton,M ot ol shalpr
i
or a
l oduce r esent i
epr
atve
BO Ms f each oft accused STBS and docum ent i descrbi t stuct e and
or
he
aton
i ng he r ur

f nci o t r evan c p an orc onens wi n t ( 0)day oft e dae o t s
u ton f he el t his d/ omp
t t en 1
hi
s h t f hi
Or .I addii Mot ol shalpr
der n
ton, or a
l oduce a winesst es iyconcer ngt accused STB
t
ot tf
ni he
har
dwar and com ponent wihi t s tm e perod oras ot wi agr upon by t
e
s t n hi i
i
her se eed
he
pari
t
es.
3. Appl l ' M oton t Com pelFudherResponses t l erogat i Regar ng
e nc.
s
i o
o nt r ores
di

Se - Bo Pa en s (
tTop x t t Nos,1 2 ( E,28 fl on Mar h 27,201 i GRANTED
9- 2) D. 6) i
ed
c
2s
I PART AND DENI I PART asf l
N
ED N
ol
ows:
a. DENI wih r
ED t espec t I erogat y Nos. 19 & 21 i vi of M ot ol s
t o nt r or
n ew
or a'
suppf ent r
em al esponses w hi ar consi entwih t r esent i m ade durng t
ch e
st
t he epr
atons
i he
m eet and conf pr
er ocess and w hi pr de sufi enti or aton r
ch ovi
fci nf m i esponsi t t
ve o hese
i erogat i
nt r ores.
b. G RANTED wih r
t espec t l erogat y Nos. 20 & 22, t Coud fndi
t o nt r or
he
i ng
M ot ol s suppl ent r
di y, or a
or a'
em al esponses ar vague and/ i fci . Accor ngl M ot ol
e
or nsufi ent

shal pr de beter r
l ovi
t esponses t t
o hese i erogat i i udi a descrpton of t
nt r ores ncl ng
ii
he
har
dwar com ponent i t accused STB t suppod t cl m ed I f tons wihi
e
s n he
hat
he ai
PG unc i
tn

t ( 0 d soft e da e of hi Or
en 1 ) ay
h t t s der

DONEANDORDEREDi Ch mb r, t a , oiati lq'a o Api2 1 .
n a es a MimiFlr hs - y f r, 0 2
d
Y
l
- t w &x m.
&
Ted E.Bandsta
r
Uni St es M agi r e Judge
t
ed at
stat

Copi f ni
es ur shed t
o:
Honor e Robed N.Scol
abl
a
Counselofr d
ecor