Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
336
ORDER granting 227 Sealed Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories; granting in part 285 Sealed Motion to Compel Production of Documents; granting in part and denying in part 286 Sealed Motion to Compel Further Responses to Interrogatories. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ted E. Bandstra on 4/24/2012. (ra)
UNI
TED STATES DI
STRI COURT
CT
SOUTHERN DI
STRI O F FLO RI
CT
DA
CASE NO.1023580- VCI SCOLY BANDSTRA
M OTORO LA M O BI TY,I ,
LI
NC.
Cljntf,
lëi i
f
APPLE I ,
NC.
Def
endant
.
/
APPLE I .
NC ,
Count cl m Pl ntf,
er ai ai if
M oTo Ro LA,l . and
Nc
MoToRoL MoBilY,Nc.
.
A
LT l ,
Count cl m Def
er ai
endant
s.
/
ORDER
THI CAusE cam ebef et
S
or hecoudont ol i pr ral scovew m otonsfl
hef l ng et i di
ow
i i
ed
byt padi i t above- i
he
es n he
captoned case.Upon r ew oft
evi
hese m otons,aI r
i
l esponses
and r i t et t coud fl and applcabl I i i her
epl her o, he
es
i
e
i e aw, t s eby
O RDERED AND ADJUDGED asf l
ol
ows:
1.Appl Ic. ( ed) tont Comp Res on est lt r t i Regar n
e n ' Seal Mo i o
s
el p s o n eroga or
es
dig
ed
anua y 31,201 i GRANTED
r
2s
Se - p Bo Pa en s ( .1 22)( E.2 fl on J
tTo x t t Nos 9- D. 27) i
consi entwih t s Coud' Febr y 24,2012 Or addr ng t s m ater
st
t hi
s
uar
der
essi hi
t .
2. pl lc. I ed Mo i t Comp Pr duci of umen san Te t
Ap e,n ' seal ) t o
s
on
el o ton Doc
t d si
mony
Reg di SetTop BoxComp en s( E. 5)fed on Mar h 2 201 i GRANTED I
ar ng on t D. 28 i
l
c 7, 2 s
N
PART, he Coud fndi t Appl s Requestf Pr
t
i ng hat
e'
or oducton Nos.5 & 6 seek i or aton
i
nf m i
whih i r ev t o t e s j t tero t i ac i Specf l t e Courfn t tt e
c s el an t h ubec mat f hs t
on.
ical h
i y,
t ids ha h
i or i r di t stuct e ofi egr ed cicuis cont ned i accused M ot ol
nf maton egar ng he r ur
nt at
r t
ai
n
or a
Pr ducs icu n Br adc doc
o t n ldig o om
umen a i an Bis o Maer s (BOM' f r s ch
t ton d l f t i '
l
al ' ' o u
)
accus M ot ol pr
ed
or a oduct ar r
s e esponsi t t
ve o hese i erogat i l vi oft padi
nt r ores. n ew he
es'
cont pl ed stpul i r di t spr
em at
i aton egar ng hi oducton,M ot ol shalpr
i
or a
l oduce r esent i
epr
atve
BO Ms f each oft accused STBS and docum ent i descrbi t stuct e and
or
he
aton
i ng he r ur
f nci o t r evan c p an orc onens wi n t ( 0)day oft e dae o t s
u ton f he el t his d/ omp
t t en 1
hi
s h t f hi
Or .I addii Mot ol shalpr
der n
ton, or a
l oduce a winesst es iyconcer ngt accused STB
t
ot tf
ni he
har
dwar and com ponent wihi t s tm e perod oras ot wi agr upon by t
e
s t n hi i
i
her se eed
he
pari
t
es.
3. Appl l ' M oton t Com pelFudherResponses t l erogat i Regar ng
e nc.
s
i o
o nt r ores
di
Se - Bo Pa en s (
tTop x t t Nos,1 2 ( E,28 fl on Mar h 27,201 i GRANTED
9- 2) D. 6) i
ed
c
2s
I PART AND DENI I PART asf l
N
ED N
ol
ows:
a. DENI wih r
ED t espec t I erogat y Nos. 19 & 21 i vi of M ot ol s
t o nt r or
n ew
or a'
suppf ent r
em al esponses w hi ar consi entwih t r esent i m ade durng t
ch e
st
t he epr
atons
i he
m eet and conf pr
er ocess and w hi pr de sufi enti or aton r
ch ovi
fci nf m i esponsi t t
ve o hese
i erogat i
nt r ores.
b. G RANTED wih r
t espec t l erogat y Nos. 20 & 22, t Coud fndi
t o nt r or
he
i ng
M ot ol s suppl ent r
di y, or a
or a'
em al esponses ar vague and/ i fci . Accor ngl M ot ol
e
or nsufi ent
shal pr de beter r
l ovi
t esponses t t
o hese i erogat i i udi a descrpton of t
nt r ores ncl ng
ii
he
har
dwar com ponent i t accused STB t suppod t cl m ed I f tons wihi
e
s n he
hat
he ai
PG unc i
tn
t ( 0 d soft e da e of hi Or
en 1 ) ay
h t t s der
DONEANDORDEREDi Ch mb r, t a , oiati lq'a o Api2 1 .
n a es a MimiFlr hs - y f r, 0 2
d
Y
l
- t w &x m.
&
Ted E.Bandsta
r
Uni St es M agi r e Judge
t
ed at
stat
Copi f ni
es ur shed t
o:
Honor e Robed N.Scol
abl
a
Counselofr d
ecor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?