Patino et al v. Wolfson et al

Filing 89

ORDER granting 84 Motion for Proceedings Supplementary and to Implead Third Parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 11/25/2013. (mkr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 10-23726-CIV-HUCK/O'SULLIVAN
VANESSA PATINO and
VIVIANA PATINO,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
EL REY DEL CHIVITO CORP.,
and ARON WOLFSON,
Defendants,
vs.
CHIVITO MANIA, LLC, JUAN
IGNACIOFRASCHINI and GARRA
CHARRUA,
Impleaded Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Proceedings
Supplementary and to Implead Execution Defendants (DE# 84, 11/13/13). On
November 13, 2013, the plaintiffs filed the instant motion. The undersigned issued a
prior Order stating that “[i]f the plaintiffs renew their motion [for proceedings
supplementary], the defendant and non-party Chivito Mania, LLC shall have five (5)
business days to file a response. If no response is filed, the Court will assume that the
renewed motion is unopposed and rule accordingly.” See Order (DE# 79, 11/7/13). No
response was filed. On November 13, 2013, the Clerk of the Court issued writs of
execution against the judgment debtors, El Rey del Chivito Corp. and Aron Wolfson,

and the plaintiffs filed the affidavit of attorney Anthony F. Sanchez attesting that the
writs of execution remain outstanding and unsatisfied. See Plaintiffs’ Affidavit in Support
of Motion for Proceedings Supplementary and Impleader (DE# 83 at ¶6, 11/13/13); Writ
of Execution Against El Rey Del Chivito Corporation (DE# 86, 11/14/13); Writ of
Execution Against Aron Wolfson (DE# 87, 11/14/13).
The plaintiffs seek to commence proceedings supplementary to execution and
implead third parties Chivito Mania, LLC, Juan Ignacio Fraschini and Garra Charrua.
See Plaintiffs’ Motion for Proceedings Supplementary and to Implead Execution
Defendants (DE# 84 at 2, 11/13/13). “The procedure on execution – and in proceedings
supplementary to and in aid of judgment or execution – must accord with the procedure
of the state where the court is located, but a federal statute governs to the extent it
applies.” FED. R. CIV. P. 69(a)(1). Accordingly, Florida law governs the commencement
of proceedings supplementary in the instant case. See Kovacs v. National Hebrew
Glatt, Inc., 2008 WL 3851465, at *4 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 14, 2008). Florida law states that a
person who holds an unsatisfied judgment “may file an affidavit so stating, identifying, if
applicable, the issuing court, the case number, and the unsatisfied amount of the
judgment . . . , and stating that the execution is valid and outstanding, and thereupon
the judgment holder . . . is entitled to these proceedings supplementary to execution.”
Fla. Stat. § 56.29(1). “‘[S]ection 56.29 requires . . . the filing of an affidavit showing a
valid unsatisfied writ of execution on any assets prior to instituting supplementary
proceedings.’” Kovacs, 2008 WL 3851465, at *5 (citing Continental Cigar Corp. v.
Edelman & Co., Inc., 397 So.2d 957, 958 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Bleidt v. Lobato, 664
So.2d 1074, 1075 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)).
2

The plaintiffs have met the statutory requirements of Fla. Stat. § 56.29. The
affidavit of attorney Anthony F. Sanchez attested to the unsatisfied amount of the
judgment. See Plaintiffs’ Affidavit in Support of Motion for Proceedings Supplementary
and Impleader (DE# 83 at ¶5, 11/13/13). The affidavit attaches two writs of execution
and states that they remain outstanding and unsatisfied. Id. at ¶6. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Proceedings
Supplementary and to Implead Execution Defendants (DE# 84, 11/13/13) is
GRANTED. Proceedings supplementary are hereby commenced in this action pursuant
to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69 and Fla. Stat. § 56.29. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Chivito Mania, LLC, Juan Ignacio Fraschini
and Garra Charrua (collectively “impleaded defendants”) are impleaded in this action.
This Order and the Motion (DE# 84) shall be served upon the impleaded
defendants by a process server in accordance with the applicable rules of
procedure. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiffs shall file with the Court a notice
of service when each of the impleaded defendants is served with this Order and the
Motion. Once all of the impleaded defendants have been served, the plaintiffs
shall file a motion requesting a status hearing before the undersigned.
DONE AND ORDERED, in Chambers, in Miami, Florida, this 25th day of
November, 2013.
________________________________
JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
United States District Judge Huck

3