Zambrano v. Dom & Dom Pizza, Inc. et al

Filing 70

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 62 Motion Imposition of Liquidated Damages. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 5/1/2012. (mkr)

UNI
TED STATES DI
STRI CO URT
CT
SO UTHERN DI
STRI O F FLORI
CT
DA
Case No.1120207- V- '
CI O SULLl
VAN

I
CONSENT)
ALI O ANTONI M M BRANO ,
RI
O
Pl ntf
ai if

Do M & DO M PI
ZM I
NC. d/ a G I ' PI
b/ NO S ZM

a dGI
n ANCARL MONTYYA,
O
Def
endant
s.

/
ORDER

THI MATTER com es bef e t Cour on t Pl ntf M oton f Enty ofFi
S
or he
t he ai irs
i or r
nal

Ju
dgme Th I lde I ost o Lqud ed Damag ( # 62, / 6 1 an t e
nt at ncu s mp ion f i iat
i
es DE
3 1 / 2) d h
Def
endantG i
ancaro M ont s Mem or
l
oya'
andum ofLaw i O pposii t Pl ntf' M oton
n
ton o ai i s
f
i
f Enty ofFi Judgm entThatI udes l posii ofLi dat Dam ages and
or r
nal
ncl
m
ton
qui ed

I or or t d Mo i t Exend St ast Hi asCo def dan ( 68, 25 1 .
nc p a e
ton o t
ay o m
- en t DE# 4/ / 2)
On M ar 16,2012,t pl ntf fl t i t moton.See Pl ntf Moton f
ch
he ai if i he ns ant i
ed
ai irs
i or

En r o Fial ud
ty f n J gmen Tha Icl s I p ionofLqui ed Damag ( # 62,
t t n ude m ost
i
i dat
es DE
3 1 1 .OnAprl 6,201 t d en t fl a Su es i o Ban u t y ( 65,
/ 6/ 2)
i1
2, he ef dan s i
ed
gg t f kr p c DE#
on
4/ 6/ 2)ad sn t Cou t tt e c p a e de en ,
1 1
viig he
d ha h or or t f dant Dom & Dom Piz Ic.fl
z a,n , i
ed
a vol ar petton f bankr cy i t Sout n Di rctofFl i See Sugges i of
unt y ii or
upt n he
her sti
orda.
ton

Ban r t y( # 65, 1 1 . e Coud en er d a STAY ast t c p a e
k up c DE
4/ 6/ 2) Th
te
o he or or t
d en tonl.Se Or ( 6 4 1 / 2) OnAprl 201 t idi du
ef dan y e der DE# 6, / 6 1 .
i25, 2, he n vi al
def
endantfl hi r
i
ed s esponse t t i t m oton.See Def
o he ns ant i
endantG i
ancaro M ont s
l
oya'

Mem or
andum ofLaw i O pposii t Pl ntf M oton f Enty ofFi Judgm entThat
n
ton o ai irs
i or r
nal
l udes l posii ofLi dat Dam ages and l por ed Moton t Ext St as
ncl
m
ton
qui ed
ncor at
i o end ay

t Hi as Co- ef dan ( # 6 4 25 1 ) Th pl n i fl a r yonAprl 201
o m
d en t DE 8, / / 2 . e ait f i
f ed epl
i30, 2.
See Pl ntf Repl t Response t M oton f Enty ofFi JudgmentThatI udes
ai i
rs
yo
o
i or r
nal
ncl

I osion o Lqui t d Damag ( 69, / / 2 . s ma t i r f
mp t f i da e
i
es DE# 4 30 1 ) Thi ter s i or
pe
consi aton.
der i

I t e is an c e, hej y r ur ed a v diti f oro t e pl n i an a ns
n h n t t as t ur et n
er c n av f h ait f d gai t
f
t e def dan si t e amoun of$ 0 00. Ju yVer c ( 60,3 1 / 2) Th
h
en t n h
t 25, 00. See r dit DE#
/ 31 . e

Cour en er d afnaludgmen i a c dan e wi t sv dit Se Amen Fi
t te i j
t n c or c t hi er c . e
h
ded nal
Ju
dgmen ( 5 3 1 / 2 . e pl n i n s st i e I da ed dama s
t DE# 3, / 3 1 ) Th ait f ow eek o mpos i t
f
qui
ge
a n t h idi dual endan lpur an t 26 U. C. 21 b) See Pl n i s Repl
gais t e n vi def
t su t o
S. j 6( .
ait r
f
y
t Respons t Moton f Enty ofFi JudgmentThatI udes I posii of
o
e o
i or r
nal
ncl
m
ton

Lqui t d Damag ( 69, 30 1 . e i vdu de en
i da e
es DE# 4/ / 2) Th ndii al f dantar
guest a t Cour
h t he
t
S h d exen Ihe au omat lsayt hi aswel an no r ole t i u of
' oul t d t
s
t i t o m
c
l d t es v he ss e
,
I dat dam ages untlsuch a tme as t i
i
qui ed
i
i
hat ssue can be addr
essed as t bot
o
h

def
endant 'See Def
s.
'
endantGi
ancaro M ont s Mem or
l
oya'
andum ofLaw i O pposii t
n
ton o

Pl ntf' M oton f Enty ofFi Judgm entThatl udes I posii ofLi dat
ai ifs
i or r
nal
ncl
m
ton
qui ed

Damag an I or a e Mo i t Exend St ast Hi asCo- en t( #
es d nc por t d ton o t
ay o m
def dan DE
68, / / 2 .
4 25 1 )

1The pl ntf i tal soughtI dat damages agai tbot def
ai i nii l
f
y
i
qui ed
ns
h endant but
s
now agr t I dat dam ages shoul onl be i posed agai tt i vi
ees hat i
qui ed
d y
m
ns he ndi dual
def
endantbecause t s m ateri st
hi
t s ayed as t t cor at def
o he por e endant See Pl ntf'
.
ai ifs
Repl t Response t M oton f Enty ofFi Judgm entThatl udes l posii of
yo
o
i or r
nal
ncl
m
ton

Li da e Damag ( 69 a 1, 30 1 (t tngt tt e j r awar sh d be
qui t d
es DE#
t 4/ / 2) s a i ha h u y
d oul
I da e a t t e idi du de endan)
i t d s o h n vi al f
qui
t.

The pr ec i oft aut atc st does notappl t co- endant who ar
ot ton he om i ay
y o def
s
e

n i b r ty. De t v. e 336 B. 55 55 ( D.Fl 200 ( o ig t at
ot n ank up c See wi Daly,
t
R. 2, 6 S. a. 6) n tn h
She case I i cl t ext ng a st t non'
t
aw s ear hat endi
ay o
bankr co- endant i done
upt def
ss

r el,usied onl i ' s crumsan esn.Her t ej ys ical f d ' l at
ar y j t i
f
y n unu ual i
c t c ') e, h ur pecf l oun l h
i y
t
t d en ts ei k w orsh
he ef dan l ) t ne
her
owed r l sdi egar f t e ma t o wh h i
eckes sr d or h
ter f et ert
s
c duc wa pr bi b t Fai Lab St dar s Ac . See Ver c For ( 60 a
on t s ohi t y he r or an d t'
ed
'
dit m DE#
t

1, / 3 1 . 'u ysfn n o wif nes depr est e dititc r o an dicet t
3 1 / 2) A j r ' idig f lul s
l
i h s r ou t f y s r i o
v
c
on
r
educe I dat dam ages based on i ow n fndi ofgood f t 'Al ez Per v.
i
qui ed
t
s
i ng
aih. var
'
ez

San or or do Ken Cl Ic. 51 F. 1 50,11 ( 1 h Ci. 8) Ac or n y,
f d- l
an
nel ub. n , 5 3d 1
66 1 t r 200 . c digl
ii
ts

ORDERED AND A DJUDG ED t t Pl ntf M oton f Enty ofFi
hat he ai ifs
i or r
nal

J dgmen Th I ldes l sion o Li da e Damage ( # 62,3 1 1 i
u
t at ncu
mpo t f qui t d
i
s DE
/ 6/ 2) s
GRANTED i par and DENI i par and t Def
n
t
ED n
t
he
endantG i
ancaro M ont s
l
oya'
M emor
andum ofLaw i Opposii t Pl ntf Moton f Enty ofFi Judgm entThat
n
ton o ai i
fs
i or r
nal

l udes I posii ofLi dat Dam ages and I por ed M oton t Ex end St as
ncl
m
ton
qui ed
ncor at
i o t
ay

t Hi asCo def
o m
- endan ( 68, / / 2 i DENI f t e r s ss a e h ei.
t DE# 4 25 1 ) s
ED or h ea on t t d er n
The under gned w i i
si
l ssue a separ e O r ent i an awar ofI dat damages
l
at der erng
d i
qui ed
agai t i vi
nst he ndi dual endant
def
.

DO NE AND ORDERED,i Cham ber i M i i I i t s 1stday ofM ay,
n
s, n am , orda, hi
2012.

' f
#

.

JO HN J. SULL AN
UNI
TED ATE MAG I
STRATE JUDG E
Copi f ni
es ur shed t
o:
A1counselofr d
I
ecor