Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hotfile Corp. et al

Filing 196

WITHDRAWAL of Motion to File Documents Under Seal (DE 186) (Stetson, Karen)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS/TURNOFF DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., Plaintiffs, v. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10. Defendants. / HOTFILE CORP., Counterclaimant, v. WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., Counterdefendant. / PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL (Dkt. No. 186) Plaintiffs hereby give notice of withdrawal of Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Documents Under Seal (Dkt. No. 186). Defendants have agreed that the previously redacted material based on defendants’ confidentiality designation may now be publicly disclosed. Accordingly, plaintiffs are now filing publicly the documents that they sought to file under seal: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion and Memorandum of Law to Compel the Deposition of Andrei Ianakov; (2) Exhibit A to the Declaration of Luke C. Platzer in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Deposition of Andrei Ianakov; (3) Exhibit B to the Declaration of Luke C. Platzer in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Deposition of Andrei Ianakov; (4) Exhibit C to the Declaration of Luke C. Platzer in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Deposition of Andrei Ianakov; (5) Exhibit D to the Declaration of Luke C. Platzer in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Deposition of Andrei Ianakov; (6) Exhibit E to the Declaration of Luke C. Platzer in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Deposition of Andrei Ianakov; and (7) Exhibit F to the Declaration of Luke C. Platzer in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel the Deposition of Andrei Ianakov. Plaintiffs will separately file a motion to substitute newly redacted documents for the versions filed in the public record (Dkt. Nos. 185 and 186). Dated: December 22, 2011 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Karen L. Stetson Karen L. Stetson GRAY-ROBINSON, P.A. 1221 Brickell Avenue 16th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 416-6880 Facsimile: (305) 416-6887 MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. Karen R. Thorland (Pro Hac Vice) 15301 Ventura Blvd. Building E Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 Phone: (818) 995-6600 Fax: (818) 285-4403 JENNER & BLOCK LLP Steven B. Fabrizio (Pro Hac Vice) Duane C. Pozza (Pro Hac Vice) Luke C. Platzer (Pro Hac Vice) 1099 New York Ave., N.W. Suite 900 Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 639-6000 Facsimile: (202) 639-6066 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 22nd Day of December, 2011, I served the following documents on all counsel of record on the attached service list via the Court’s CM/ECF filing system: Plaintiffs’ Notice of Withdrawal of Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Documents Under Seal I further certify that I am admitted to the United States Court for the Southern District of Florida and certify that this certificate of Service was executed on this date. By: /s/ Karen L. Stetson Karen L. Stetson 3 SERVICE LIST Disney Enterprises, Inc., et al. v. Hotfile Corp. et al. CASE NO. 11-CIV-20427-JORDAN RASCO KLOCK Janet T. Munn jmunn@rascoklock.com 283 Catalonia Ave., Suite 200 Coral Gables, FL 33134 Phone: 305-476-7101 Fax: 305-476-7102 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP Anthony P. Schoenberg tschoenberg@fbm.com Roderick M. Thompson rthompson@fbm.com N. Andrew Leibnitz aleibnitz@fbm.com Deepak Gupta dgupta@fbm.com Janel Thamkul jthamkul@fbm.com 235 Montgomery Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Phone: 415-954-4400 Attorney for Defendants Hotfile Corp. and Anton Titov Attorneys for Defendants Hotfile Corp. and Anton Titov BOSTON LAW GROUP, PC Valentin Gurvits vgurvits@bostonlawgroup.com 825 Beacon Street, Suite 20 Newton Centre, MA 02459 Phone: 617-928-1804 Attorneys for Defendants Hotfile Corp. and Anton Titov 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?