Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hotfile Corp. et al
Filing
221
REPLY to Response to Motion re 200 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel PLAINTIFFS' RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF PARTICULAR SOURCE CODE >PLAINTIFFS' REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL PARTICULAR SOURCE CODE< filed by Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Stetson, Karen)
EXHIBIT B
Platzer, Luke C
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
RThompson@fbm.com
Thursday, December 22, 2011 1:24 PM
RThompson@fbm.com; Fabrizio, Steven B
Platzer, Luke C; Pozza, Duane; ALeibnitz@fbm.com; TSchoenberg@fbm.com;
jmunn@rascoklock.com; vgurvits@bostonlawgroup.com
RE: Hotfile - Schedule through MSJ Briefs
Steve, I received your voice mail last evening. To be clear, yes we agree to both the
extension you proposed on rebuttal experts and a reasonable corresponding extension for the
MSJ briefing. In short, this confirms we have an agreement on the rebuttal report extension.
Here is a complete proposal with the minor changes from your proposal in CAPS.
Rebuttal expert reports - move this from Dec. 23rd to January 6th.
Complete rebuttal expert depositions by January 20th.
Motions for summary judgment to be filed by JANUARY 30TH (one week extension from present
date.) MSJ oppositions to be filed by FEBRUARY 20 (three weeks instead of two).
MSJ replies to be filed by MARCH 1 (ten days instead of one week).
As to discovery motions that are filed tomorrow, the oppositions would be due in 14 days on
January 6, the same day as the rebuttal reports.
We therefore would accept your offer of a short extension, perhaps until Tuesday January 10
for oppositions, with the replies due a week later per the local rules.
We should also discuss the timing and content of mediation briefing.
Rod
-----Original Message----From: Thompson, Rod (27) x4445
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 3:58 PM
To: Fabrizio, Steven B
Cc: Platzer, Luke C; Pozza, Duane; Leibnitz, Andrew (21) x4932; Schoenberg, Tony (28) x4963;
'jmunn@rascoklock.com'; 'vgurvits@bostonlawgroup.com'
Subject: RE: Hotfile - Schedule through MSJ Briefs
Steve, yes, we expect that there will be a to-be-agreed corresponding extension on the MSJ
briefing but not as long as you proposed.
We can work out those details.
Rod
-----Original Message----From: Fabrizio, Steven B [mailto:SFabrizio@jenner.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:10 PM
To: Thompson, Rod (27) x4445
Cc: Platzer, Luke C; Pozza, Duane; Leibnitz, Andrew (21) x4932; Schoenberg, Tony (28) x4963;
'jmunn@rascoklock.com'; 'vgurvits@bostonlawgroup.com'
Subject: Re: Hotfile - Schedule through MSJ Briefs
1
Rod - I assume you are contemplating some reasonable corresponding extension of the briefing.
Otherwise I don't know that we want (or really can afford) any rebuttal extension. Please
let's try to have at least an understanding on this before we extend rebuttals.
SBF
-----------------------Sent from Blackberry
----- Original Message ----From: RThompson@fbm.com [mailto:RThompson@fbm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 11:42 AM
To: Fabrizio, Steven B
Cc: Platzer, Luke C; Pozza, Duane; ALeibnitz@fbm.com ; TSchoenberg@fbm.com
; jmunn@rascoklock.com ;
vgurvits@bostonlawgroup.com
Subject: RE: Hotfile - Schedule through MSJ Briefs
Steve, we are fine with extending the deadline for rebuttal expert reports until January 6
and depositions until the January 20. We are still considering what adjustment, if any, is
needed on the Summary Judgment--but that can wait.
Please have Karen prepare the stipulation/joint motion as Janet is out for the rest of the
week. Thanks.
Rod
P.S.
We may have a discovery motion as well.
-----Original Message----From: Fabrizio, Steven B [mailto:SFabrizio@jenner.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:23 PM
To: Thompson, Rod (27) x4445
Cc: Platzer, Luke C; Pozza, Duane; Leibnitz, Andrew (21) x4932; Schoenberg, Tony (28) x4963
Subject: Re: Hotfile - Schedule through MSJ Briefs
Rod - I don't know if Luke tried to call you on this. We really need an answer by tomorrow
morning or we will not be able to get the benefit of this. For what it is worth, we expect
to be filing a couple of motions this week (a renewed Lemuria motion and a renewed motion to
compel specific, limited portions of the source code). We feel we need to get them on file
this week. However, it is not our intention to try to ruin your team's holiday. If we reach
agreement per my email below, we would be willing to extend the date of your opposition until
after the new year. Please let us know asap. Thanks.
SBF
From: "Roderick M. Thompson"
>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:13:21 -0600
To: Steven Fabrizio >
Cc: Luke Platzer >,
Duane Pozza >, Andrew Leibnitz
>, "Anthony P.
Schoenberg" >
Subject: RE: Hotfile - Schedule through MSJ Briefs
Steve, I will discuss this with our team and clients, and get back to you shortly.
2
I just heard, however, that Luke is not willing to extend the time for confidentiality
designations for our six days of Sofia depositions, which are currently due on December 27.
While your clients may wish to have a report on what happened in Sofia, they won't get one
next week if your team is taking some time off in any event.
Please reconsider and allow us at least until January 6.
extension for all depositions.) Thanks.
(We would agree to a comparable
Rod
________________________________
Steven B. Fabrizio
Jenner & Block LLP
1099 New York Avenue, N.W.
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20001-4412
Tel (202) 639-6040
Fax (202) 661-4823
SFabrizio@jenner.com
www.jenner.com
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this
communication is prohibited. If you believe that you have received this email in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system.
________________________________
-----Original Message----From: Fabrizio, Steven B [mailto:SFabrizio@jenner.com]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 12:58 AM
To: Thompson, Rod (27) x4445
Subject: Hotfile - Schedule through MSJ Briefs
Rod - Following up on our discussion in SF, subject to client approval, which I do not expect
to be a hurdle, here is what we propose for getting us from here to summary judgment filings.
If you agree, we would like to get a joint motion filed asap, so we will know the schedule
before our respective teams depart for the holidays.
Rebuttal expert reports - move this from Dec. 23rd to January 6th.
Complete rebuttal expert depositions by January 20th.
Motions for summary judgment to be filed by February 10th.
MSJ oppositions to be filed by March 2nd.
MSJ replies to be filed by March 16th.
As for the MSJ briefing, it seems to make the most sense to have two sets of summary judgment
briefs - one for the main copyright and DMCA issues, and one for the Warner counterclaims.
We will defer to you as to whether you want a third summary judgment brief for Titov's
3
personal liability. Our sense is that there would be so much duplication of background and
facts that it is better to just include Titov in the main copyright brief, albeit with extra
pages so we can properly address the issues.
Assuming a two brief structure, we do not need any additional pages for the WB counterclaim
brief. For the copyright/DMCA/Titov brief, I would think we would want to ask the court for
40 page opening and opposition briefs, and 20 page replies.
Let me have your thoughts on this as soon as possible.
Thanks.
SBF
________________________________
Steven B. Fabrizio
Jenner & Block LLP
1099 New York Avenue, N.W.
Suite 900
Washington, DC 20001-4412
Tel (202) 639-6040
Fax (202) 661-4823
SFabrizio@jenner.com
www.jenner.com
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING: This email may contain privileged or confidential information and is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this
communication is prohibited. If you believe that you have received this email in error,
please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your system.
________________________________
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?