Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hotfile Corp. et al

Filing 229

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time >JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING DEADLINES SET FORTH IN THE COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT #133) AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (DKT # 157)< re 157 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, 133 Scheduling Order,,, Order Referring Case to Mediation,,, Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,, by Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., Hotfile Corp., Anton Titov, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.. Responses due by 2/6/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stetson, Karen)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS/TURNOFF
DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.,
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION,
UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP,
COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and
DOES 1-10.
Defendants.
/
HOTFILE CORP.,
Counterclaimant,
v.
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
Counterdefendant.
/
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING DEADLINES SET FORTH IN THE COURT’S
SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT # 133) AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME (DKT # 157)
THIS CAUSE came before the court on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Extension of
Summary Judgment Briefing Deadlines Set Forth in the Scheduling Order (Dkt # 133), as
modified by the Court’s Order on Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt # 157). This Court has
considered the agreed motion, has heard from the parties at a hearing on January 13, 2012, and
being otherwise duly advised here, it is hereby:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Joint Motion for Extension of Summary
Judgment Briefing Deadlines to is hereby GRANTED. The Scheduling Order in this case (Dkt #
133) is modified as follows:
February 10, 2012

Motions for Summary Judgment on Hotfile Corp.’s
Counterclaim against Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.
(“Counterclaim”) are filed.

February 17, 2012

All other Motions for Summary Judgment unrelated to the
Counterclaim are filed.

February 27, 2012

Oppositions to Motions for Summary Judgment on the
Counterclaim are filed.

March 7, 2012

Oppositions to Motions for Summary Judgment unrelated
to the Counterclaim are filed.

March 12, 2012

Replies in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment on
the Counterclaim are filed.

March 19, 2012

Replies in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment
unrelated to the Counterclaim are filed.

As either Plaintiffs or Defendants may choose, the parties may combine their motion for
summary judgment on Anton Titov’s liability with their motion for summary judgment on
Hotfile Corp.’s liability, with any memorandum in support of such a consolidated motion not to
exceed 40 pages. Opposition to such a consolidated motion shall not exceed 40 pages, and the
reply memorandum in support of such a motion shall not exceed 20 pages.
DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at Miami, Florida this ____ day of __________ 2012.
__________________________
Kathleen M. Williams
United States District Judge
cc:

All Counsel of Record

2