Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hotfile Corp. et al

Filing 450

RESPONSE in Opposition re 371 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Motion and Memorandum of Law to Strike the Declaration of Jennifer V. Yeh Filed in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Anton Titov's Motion for Summary Judgment and to Defendant Hotfile Corp. >PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS HOTFILE CORPORATION AND ANTON TITOV'S SECOND MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF JENNIFER V. YEH (PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION)< filed by Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Jennifer V. Yeh in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Second Motion to Strike the Declaration of Jennifer V. Yeh (Public Redacted Version), # 2 Exhibit A to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 3 Exhibit B to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 4 Exhibit C to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 5 Exhibit D to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 6 Exhibit E to declaration of J. Yeh, # 7 Exhibit F to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 8 Exhibit G to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 9 Exhibit H to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 10 Exhibit I to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 11 Exhibit J to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 12 Exhibit K to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 13 Exhibit L to Declaration of J. Yeh)(Stetson, Karen)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT D UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF vs. HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. _________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. _______________________________________________________ HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MICHAEL BENTKOVER Los Angeles, California Tuesday, December 13, 2011 Reported by: LORI SCINTA, RPR CSR No. 4811 Job No. 177476A MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 12/13/2011 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 3 4 7 DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., and WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC., 8 Plaintiffs, 5 6 9 10 vs. CASE NO. 11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV, and DOES 1-10, 11 12 13 Defendants. _________________________ AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. _______________________________________________________ 14 15 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 16 Videotaped deposition of MICHAEL BENTKOVER, 17 taken on behalf of Defendants and Counterclaimant 18 at 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 3600, Los Angeles, 19 California, beginning at 9:38 A.M. and ending at 20 12:17 P.M. on Tuesday, December 13, 2011, before 21 LORI SCINTA, RPR, Certified Shorthand Reporter No. 22 4811. 23 24 25 2 MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 12/13/2011 APPEARANCES: 2 3 For Plaintiffs: 4 5 6 7 JENNER & BLOCK LLP BY: STEVEN B. FABRIZIO Attorney at Law 1099 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20001-4412 202.639.6000 Email: sfabrizio@jenner.com 8 9 For Defendants and Counterclaimant: 10 11 12 13 14 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP BY: EVAN M. ENGSTROM Attorney at Law 235 Montgomery Street San Francisco, California 94104 415.954.4400 Email: eengstrom@fbm.com 15 16 Videographer: 17 18 19 20 VONYARN MASON SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS 20 Corporate Park, Suite 350 Irvine, California 92606 877.955.3855 21 22 23 24 25 3 MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12/13/2011 10:54 1 10:54 2 10:54 3 the -- the email is July 1st, 2011 -- were you involved 10:54 4 in searching for possible infringing material -- 10:54 5 material that infringes Warner's copyrights on Hotfile? 10:54 6 MR. FABRIZIO: Objection. 10:54 7 THE WITNESS: In July 2011? 10:54 8 10:54 9 10:54 10 10:55 11 10:55 12 10:55 13 Q With all -- what vendors would you work with? 10:55 14 A OpSec. 10:55 15 Q Is that it? 10:55 16 A That's it. 10:55 17 Q Okay. 10:55 18 10:55 19 10:55 20 10:55 21 10:55 22 10:55 23 10:55 24 Was OpSec the only entity that was searching 10:55 25 for Warner-infringing material on -- or material that BY MR. ENGSTROM: Q Were you involved at this time -- so this is Vague. Yes. BY MR. ENGSTROM: Q What did you do with respect to searching for possibly infringing material on Hotfile? A I didn't do anything with it. I would work with vendors who would find our content. Were these vendors running Kapow, to your knowledge? MR. FABRIZIO: witness's testimony. THE WITNESS: Objection. Misstates the He said only one vendor. I don't understand the question. BY MR. ENGSTROM: Q Okay. Let's backtrack. 76 MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 10:55 1 10:55 2 MR. FABRIZIO: 10:55 3 speculation, lacks foundation. 10:55 4 THE WITNESS: 10:55 5 hired to look for our content. 10:55 6 BY MR. ENGSTROM: 10:55 7 10:55 8 10:56 9 MR. FABRIZIO: 10:56 10 THE WITNESS: 10:56 11 10:56 12 10:56 13 10:56 14 MR. FABRIZIO: Objection. 10:56 15 THE WITNESS: Bret Boivin. 10:56 16 MR. FABRIZIO: 10:56 17 10:56 18 10:56 19 Q Is that it? 10:56 20 A Yes. 10:56 21 Q Okay. 10:56 22 10:56 23 10:56 24 10:56 25 12/13/2011 was infringing Warner's copyrights on Hotfile? Q Objection. Calls for OpSec was the only vendor that we To your knowledge, were people within Warner looking for Warner content on Hotfile? Objection. Vague. Yes. BY MR. ENGSTROM: Q Who within Warner, to your knowledge, was looking for Warner content on Hotfile? Vague as to time. Are we still in the July 2011 timeframe? MR. ENGSTROM: Yes. Only Bret Boivin? He runs the Kapow system. And do you know what he does with the Kapow system -MR. FABRIZIO: Objection -- BY MR. ENGSTROM: Q -- with respect to finding material on Hotfile 77 MICHAEL BENTKOVER HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER 12/13/2011 1 2 3 4 I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify: That the foregoing proceedings were taken 5 before me at the time and place herein set forth; that 6 any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to 7 testifying, were duly sworn; that a record of the 8 proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand 9 which was thereafter transcribed under my direction; 10 that the foregoing transcript is a true record of the 11 testimony given. 12 Further, that if the foregoing pertains to 13 the original transcript of a deposition in a Federal 14 Case, before completion of the proceedings, review of 15 the transcript [ x ] was [ ] was not requested. 16 I further certify I am neither financially 17 interested in the action nor a relative or employee 18 of any attorney or party to this action. 19 20 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date subscribed my name. 21 22 Dated: 12-15-11 23 24 25 ________________________________ LORI SCINTA, RPR CSR No. 4811 112

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?