Disney Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Hotfile Corp. et al
Filing
450
RESPONSE in Opposition re 371 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Motion and Memorandum of Law to Strike the Declaration of Jennifer V. Yeh Filed in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Anton Titov's Motion for Summary Judgment and to Defendant Hotfile Corp. >PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS HOTFILE CORPORATION AND ANTON TITOV'S SECOND MOTION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF JENNIFER V. YEH (PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION)< filed by Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Universal City Studios Productions LLLP, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Jennifer V. Yeh in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Second Motion to Strike the Declaration of Jennifer V. Yeh (Public Redacted Version), # 2 Exhibit A to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 3 Exhibit B to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 4 Exhibit C to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 5 Exhibit D to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 6 Exhibit E to declaration of J. Yeh, # 7 Exhibit F to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 8 Exhibit G to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 9 Exhibit H to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 10 Exhibit I to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 11 Exhibit J to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 12 Exhibit K to Declaration of J. Yeh, # 13 Exhibit L to Declaration of J. Yeh)(Stetson, Karen)
EXHIBIT D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.,
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM
CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY
STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP,
COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES,
INC., and WARNER BROS.
ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
Plaintiffs,
CASE NO.
11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF
vs.
HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV,
and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.
_________________________
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION.
_______________________________________________________
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF MICHAEL BENTKOVER
Los Angeles, California
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Reported by:
LORI SCINTA, RPR
CSR No. 4811
Job No. 177476A
MICHAEL BENTKOVER
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
12/13/2011
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
3
4
7
DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.,
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM
CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY
STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP,
COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES,
INC., and WARNER BROS.
ENTERTAINMENT INC.,
8
Plaintiffs,
5
6
9
10
vs.
CASE NO.
11-20427-WILLIAMS-TURNOFF
HOTFILE CORP., ANTON TITOV,
and DOES 1-10,
11
12
13
Defendants.
_________________________
AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION.
_______________________________________________________
14
15
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
16
Videotaped deposition of MICHAEL BENTKOVER,
17
taken on behalf of Defendants and Counterclaimant
18
at 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 3600, Los Angeles,
19
California, beginning at 9:38 A.M. and ending at
20
12:17 P.M. on Tuesday, December 13, 2011, before
21
LORI SCINTA, RPR, Certified Shorthand Reporter No.
22
4811.
23
24
25
2
MICHAEL BENTKOVER
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
12/13/2011
APPEARANCES:
2
3
For Plaintiffs:
4
5
6
7
JENNER & BLOCK LLP
BY: STEVEN B. FABRIZIO
Attorney at Law
1099 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900
Washington, D.C. 20001-4412
202.639.6000
Email: sfabrizio@jenner.com
8
9
For Defendants and Counterclaimant:
10
11
12
13
14
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
BY: EVAN M. ENGSTROM
Attorney at Law
235 Montgomery Street
San Francisco, California 94104
415.954.4400
Email: eengstrom@fbm.com
15
16
Videographer:
17
18
19
20
VONYARN MASON
SARNOFF COURT REPORTERS
20 Corporate Park, Suite 350
Irvine, California 92606
877.955.3855
21
22
23
24
25
3
MICHAEL BENTKOVER
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
12/13/2011
10:54
1
10:54
2
10:54
3
the -- the email is July 1st, 2011 -- were you involved
10:54
4
in searching for possible infringing material --
10:54
5
material that infringes Warner's copyrights on Hotfile?
10:54
6
MR. FABRIZIO:
Objection.
10:54
7
THE WITNESS:
In July 2011?
10:54
8
10:54
9
10:54
10
10:55
11
10:55
12
10:55
13
Q
With all -- what vendors would you work with?
10:55
14
A
OpSec.
10:55
15
Q
Is that it?
10:55
16
A
That's it.
10:55
17
Q
Okay.
10:55
18
10:55
19
10:55
20
10:55
21
10:55
22
10:55
23
10:55
24
Was OpSec the only entity that was searching
10:55
25
for Warner-infringing material on -- or material that
BY MR. ENGSTROM:
Q
Were you involved at this time -- so this is
Vague.
Yes.
BY MR. ENGSTROM:
Q
What did you do with respect to searching for
possibly infringing material on Hotfile?
A
I didn't do anything with it.
I would work
with vendors who would find our content.
Were these vendors running Kapow, to
your knowledge?
MR. FABRIZIO:
witness's testimony.
THE WITNESS:
Objection.
Misstates the
He said only one vendor.
I don't understand the question.
BY MR. ENGSTROM:
Q
Okay.
Let's backtrack.
76
MICHAEL BENTKOVER
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
10:55
1
10:55
2
MR. FABRIZIO:
10:55
3
speculation, lacks foundation.
10:55
4
THE WITNESS:
10:55
5
hired to look for our content.
10:55
6
BY MR. ENGSTROM:
10:55
7
10:55
8
10:56
9
MR. FABRIZIO:
10:56
10
THE WITNESS:
10:56
11
10:56
12
10:56
13
10:56
14
MR. FABRIZIO:
Objection.
10:56
15
THE WITNESS:
Bret Boivin.
10:56
16
MR. FABRIZIO:
10:56
17
10:56
18
10:56
19
Q
Is that it?
10:56
20
A
Yes.
10:56
21
Q
Okay.
10:56
22
10:56
23
10:56
24
10:56
25
12/13/2011
was infringing Warner's copyrights on Hotfile?
Q
Objection.
Calls for
OpSec was the only vendor that we
To your knowledge, were people within Warner
looking for Warner content on Hotfile?
Objection.
Vague.
Yes.
BY MR. ENGSTROM:
Q
Who within Warner, to your knowledge, was
looking for Warner content on Hotfile?
Vague as to time.
Are we still in the July 2011
timeframe?
MR. ENGSTROM:
Yes.
Only Bret Boivin?
He runs the Kapow system.
And do you know what he does with the
Kapow system -MR. FABRIZIO:
Objection --
BY MR. ENGSTROM:
Q
-- with respect to finding material on Hotfile
77
MICHAEL BENTKOVER
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER
12/13/2011
1
2
3
4
I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand
Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify:
That the foregoing proceedings were taken
5
before me at the time and place herein set forth; that
6
any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to
7
testifying, were duly sworn; that a record of the
8
proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand
9
which was thereafter transcribed under my direction;
10
that the foregoing transcript is a true record of the
11
testimony given.
12
Further, that if the foregoing pertains to
13
the original transcript of a deposition in a Federal
14
Case, before completion of the proceedings, review of
15
the transcript [ x ] was [ ] was not requested.
16
I further certify I am neither financially
17
interested in the action nor a relative or employee
18
of any attorney or party to this action.
19
20
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date
subscribed my name.
21
22
Dated: 12-15-11
23
24
25
________________________________
LORI SCINTA, RPR
CSR No. 4811
112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?