Diaz v. JT Logistics Consultans Corp et al

Filing 28

ORDER approving settlement agreement and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS to dismiss case with prejudice and retain jurisdiction until June 23, 2011 to enforce the terms of settlement( Objections to R&R due by 6/3/2011). Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 5/16/2011. (mms)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-CIV-20532-LENARD/O'SULLIVAN HILDA MAIQUEZ DIAZ, and all others similarly situated under 29 U.S.C. 216(B), Plaintiff, v. JT LOGISTICS CONSULTANS CORP., doing business as JT LOGISTICS CONSULTANTS CORP., and JULIAN TORO, individually, Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CASE BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE THIS MATTER came before the Court following a settlement conference before the undersigned and the Court having conducted a hearing concerning the settlement. THE COURT has heard from counsel and considered the terms of the settlement agreement, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. This case involves a claim for unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq ("FLSA"). In reviewing a settlement of an FLSA private claim, a court must "scrutiniz[e] the settlement for fairness," and determine that the settlement is a "fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions." Lynn Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-53 (11th Cir. 1982). A settlement entered into in an adversarial context where both sides are represented by counsel throughout litigation "is more likely to reflect a reasonable compromise of disputed issues." Id. The district court may approve the settlement in order to promote the policy of encouraging settlement of litigation. Id. at 1354. In this case, there is a bona fide legal dispute over whether enterprise coverage exists and a factual dispute surrounding the amount of overtime worked. The Court has reviewed the terms of the settlement agreement including the amount to be received by the plaintiff and the attorney’s fees and costs to be received by counsel and finds that the compromise reached by the parties is a fair and reasonable resolution of the parties' bona fide disputes. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties' settlement agreement (including attorney’s fees and costs) is hereby APPROVED. It is further RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed with prejudice and that the Court retain jurisdiction until June 23, 2011 to enforce the terms of the settlement. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 16th day of March, 2011. ________________________________ JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies provided to: United States District Judge Lenard All counsel of record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?