Lebowitz v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Filing
36
ORDER requiring response to 23 MOTION to Quash or, in the Alternative, for Protective Order filed by Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 8/23/2011. (tro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 11-21798-CIV-JORDAN/O’SULLIVAN
WALTER LEBOWITZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC.,
LEXUS DIVISION,
Defendant.
_________________________/
ORDER
THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Toyota Motor Sales’ Motion to Quash or, in
the Alternative, for Protective Order Directed at Plaintiff’s “Second Request to Produce”
(DE # 23, 7/8/11). Rule 7.1(C), Local Rules for the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida provides, in pertinent part:
Each party opposing a motion shall serve an opposing memorandum of
law no later than ten days after service of the motion as computed in the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to do so may be deemed
sufficient cause for granting the motion by default. (Emphasis
supplied).
Having received no response from the plaintiff, and a response having been due,
it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff shall file a response Toyota Motor
Sales’ Motion to Quash or, in the Alternative, for Protective Order Directed at Plaintiff’s
“Second Request to Produce” (DE # 23, 7/8/11) on or before September 6, 2011. The
failure to file a response may result in an Order granting Toyota Motor Sales’ Motion to
Quash or, in the Alternative, for Protective Order Directed at Plaintiff’s “Second Request
to Produce” (DE # 23, 7/8/11) in its entirety.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 23rd day of
August, 2011.
JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
United States District Judge Jordan
All Counsel of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?