Lebowitz v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 36

ORDER requiring response to 23 MOTION to Quash or, in the Alternative, for Protective Order filed by Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 8/23/2011. (tro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-21798-CIV-JORDAN/O’SULLIVAN WALTER LEBOWITZ, Plaintiff, v. TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, USA, INC., LEXUS DIVISION, Defendant. _________________________/ ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Toyota Motor Sales’ Motion to Quash or, in the Alternative, for Protective Order Directed at Plaintiff’s “Second Request to Produce” (DE # 23, 7/8/11). Rule 7.1(C), Local Rules for the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida provides, in pertinent part: Each party opposing a motion shall serve an opposing memorandum of law no later than ten days after service of the motion as computed in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to do so may be deemed sufficient cause for granting the motion by default. (Emphasis supplied). Having received no response from the plaintiff, and a response having been due, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff shall file a response Toyota Motor Sales’ Motion to Quash or, in the Alternative, for Protective Order Directed at Plaintiff’s “Second Request to Produce” (DE # 23, 7/8/11) on or before September 6, 2011. The failure to file a response may result in an Order granting Toyota Motor Sales’ Motion to Quash or, in the Alternative, for Protective Order Directed at Plaintiff’s “Second Request to Produce” (DE # 23, 7/8/11) in its entirety. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 23rd day of August, 2011. JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies furnished to: United States District Judge Jordan All Counsel of Record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?