Burden et al v. City of Opa Locka et al

Filing 179

ORDER SETTING RESPONSE DEADLINE. Please see Order for details. Plaintiffs' responses to 157 MOTION to Tax Costs Against Tamika Miller and 158 MOTION to Tax Costs Against Vincent Robinson are due by 3/20/2013. Signed by Judge Robin S. Rosenbaum on 3/13/2013. (bon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-22018-CIV-ROSENBAUM/SELTZER ADAM BURDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF OPA LOCKA, Defendant. / ORDER SETTING RESPONSE DEADLINE This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Response to D.E. 75 Order to Show Cause [D.E. 177]. On February 13, 2013, Defendant filed motions to tax costs against Plaintiffs Tamika Miller and Vincent Robinson [D.E. 157 & D.E. 158]. Under the Local Rules, responses to Defendant’s motions were due by March 4, 2013. However, when Plaintiffs Miller and Robinson did not file any response in opposition to Defendant’s motions, the Court ordered them to show cause why Defendant’s motion should not be granted by default. In sum, Plaintiff’s counsel responded that the failure to respond was due to his excusable neglect. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Miller and Robinson shall have until March 20, 2013, to respond to Defendant’s costs motions. Failure to timely submit a response will result in the motions being granted by default. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 13th day of March 2013. _________________________________ ROBIN S. ROSENBAUM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: The Honorable Barry S. Seltzer Counsel of Record -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?