Boy Racer, Inc. v. John Does 1-34

Filing 69

ORDER granting 66 Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery to Identify John Doe; denying as moot 67 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on 7/12/2012. (dkc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No. 11-23035-CIV-GRAHAM/GOODMAN BOY RACER, INC., Plaintiff, v. DOES 1-34, Defendant. _______________________________________ ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO TAKE EXPEDITED DISCOVERY TO IDENTIFY JOHN DOE This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Application for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery to Identify John Doe (the “Application”) and accompanying Motion for Hearing. [ECF Nos. 66; 67]. On July 6, 2012, the Undersigned entered an endorsed order imposing a July 11, 2012 deadline for the proposed deponent to submit a response but not requiring him to file one. [ECF No. 68]. The deadline has passed and no response was filed. It is therefore ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Application [ECF No. 66] is GRANTED. Plaintiff is authorized to serve a deposition subpoena, without a production of documents request, on Jeffrey Merritt, the alleged account holder of Internet Protocol (IP) address 98.254.25.208. The scope of the deposition shall be limited solely to discovering the identity of the alleged infringer who allegedly used this IP address to distribute Plaintiff’s copyrighted videos. Because the Undersigned has already granted Plaintiff’s Application, the Motion for Hearing [ECF No. 67] is DENIED AS MOOT. DONE and ORDERED, in Chambers, in Miami, Florida, this 12th day of July, 2012. Copies furnished to: The Honorable Donald L. Graham All counsel of record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?