Matos v. America Layout Corp. et al

Filing 29

ORDER approving settlement, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Recommending that the case be dismissed and that the Court retain jurisdiction until 6/25/2012 to enforce the settlement terms.(Objections to R&R due by 4/6/2012). Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 3/20/2012. (mkr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 11-24296-CIV-LENARD/O'SULLIVAN
OSMAR MATOS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
AMERICAN LAYOUT, CORP., MIRIAN
GOMEZ and JOSE ARMANDO GOMEZ,
Defendants.
__________________________________________/

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CASE BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
THIS MATTER came before the Court following a settlement conference before
the undersigned and the Court having conducted a hearing concerning the settlement.
THE COURT has heard from counsel and considered the terms of the settlement
agreement, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the
premises.
This case involves a claim for unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair
Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq ("FLSA"). In reviewing a settlement of an
FLSA private claim, a court must "scrutiniz[e] the settlement for fairness," and
determine that the settlement is a "fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute
over FLSA provisions." Lynn Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-53
(11th Cir. 1982). A settlement entered into in an adversarial context where both sides
are represented by counsel throughout litigation "is more likely to reflect a reasonable
compromise of disputed issues." Id. The district court may approve the settlement in
order to promote the policy of encouraging settlement of litigation. Id. at 1354.

In this case, there is a bona fide legal dispute over whether the defendants were
liable for overtime wages under the FLSA and a factual dispute over the number of
overtime hours worked by the plaintiff. The Court has reviewed the terms of the
settlement agreement including the amount to be received by the plaintiff and the
attorney’s fees and costs to be received by counsel and finds that the compromise
reached by the parties is a fair and reasonable resolution of the parties' bona fide
disputes. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties' settlement agreement (including
attorney’s fees and costs) is hereby APPROVED. It is further
RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed with prejudice and that the Court
retain jurisdiction until June 25, 2012 to enforce the terms of the settlement.1
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 20th day of March,
2012.
________________________________
JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies provided to:
United States District Judge Lenard
All counsel of record

1

The parties consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction for all further proceedings in
this case including any enforcement motions.
2