Reardon v. Lake Worth Enterprises, LLC et al
ORDER STRIKING 86 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Timothy Patrick Reardon for exceeding the page limits imposed by the local rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 9/26/2012. (mkr)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 12-20829-CIV-LENARD/O’SULLIVAN
TIMOTHY PATRICK REARDON,
W.B. CENTER, LLC et al.,
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to
Defendant Moore Stephens Lovelace Motion to Dismiss [DE 65] Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint
for Failure to Properly Plead a Fraud Claim and Memorandum of Law (DE# 86, 9/26/12).
Having reviewed the applicable filings and the law, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant
Moore Stephens Lovelace Motion to Dismiss [DE 65] Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for Failure
to Properly Plead a Fraud Claim and Memorandum of Law (DE# 86, 9/26/12) is STRICKEN
from the record. The instant filing fails to comply with Local Rule 7.1 (c)(2), which states in
pertinent part that “[a]bsent prior permission of the Court, neither a motion and its incorporated
memorandum of law nor the opposing memorandum of law shall exceed twenty (20) pages.”
On or before Wednesday, October 10, 2012, the plaintiff shall refile his response to Moore
Stephens Lovelace, P.A.’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Verified Complaint (D.E. #15)
(DE# 65, 9/12/12) in accordance with the page limits imposed by the local rules.
DONE AND ORDERED, in Chambers, at Miami, Florida, this 26th day of
JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
United States District Judge Lenard
All Counsel of Record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?