Baypoint Office Tower, Inc. v. Chubb Custom Insurance Company

Filing 24

ORDER denying 19 Motion to Strike Affidavit. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 6/13/2012. (tro)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 12-20893-CIV-LENARD/O’SULLIVAN BAYPOINT OFFICE TOWER, INC., Plaintiff, v. CHUBB CUSTOM INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. _________________________/ ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Affidavit of Mario Munoz in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand (DE # 19, 4/12/12). The plaintiff argues that “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that ‘[a]n affidavit or declaration used to support or oppose a motion must be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant or declarant is competent to testify on the matters stated.’ Fed.R.C.P. 56(c)(4).” Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Affidavit of Mario Munoz in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand, at p. 1. The affiant relied on non hearsay information provided by the plaintiff to the defendant in estimating the loss in this matter. Accordingly, it is 1 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Affidavit of Mario Munoz in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand (DE # 19, 4/12/12) is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED, in Chambers, at Miami, Florida, this 13th day of June, 2012. JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies furnished to: United States District Judge Lenard All Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?