Navarro v. BJ Retreader Tires, Inc. et al

Filing 20

ORDER DENYING 16 MOTION for Reconsideration re 14 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Chief Judge Federico A. Moreno on 6/19/2012. (mmz)

Download PDF
UNI TED STATES DI STRI COURT FOR THE CT SOU TH ERN D I STRI O F FLO RI CT DA M i m iD i son a vi i C as N um be 1 21 e r: 2- 005- V- O R EN O CI M M I EL A . A VA RRO , GU N Pl i if a ntf , VS. BJRETREADER TI RES I NC.a LORENZO nd BUI TRON ,i vi l ndi dualy, Def nda s e nt . ORDER DENYI DEFENDANTS'M O TI TO RECONSI NG ON DER ORDER DENYI NG D EFEN DA N TS'M O TI N T O D I I C O UN T I O SM SS V THI CAUSE ca be or t Co t upon t Def nt 'Cons i t M oton t S me f e he ur he enda s oldaed i o Re i Or rDe ng M oton t Dim isCou I an M oton t Sti Pl ntf Res e consder de nyi i o s s nt V d i o rke ai ifs pons t Mo int Dimisf rF a dUp nt eCo r ( E. .1 ) fldo Ju 5 20 2 o to o s s o r u o h u tD. No 6 , ie n ne . 1 . TheDef nt ha a gue t CountI s dbedim is dbe us i ne rr ce ve t enda s ve r d hat V houl s s e ca e t ve e i d he notc lte t tPli ifwa r quiedt s nd t m bef e tlng acl m u ie e tr ha antf s e r o e he or ii ai nderFl St . a. at j448. 1 6)a ( 11. 1 0( ()20 )Howe rt Pli ifalgest ipr de Def ntwihnotc a ha ve ,he antf le hatt ovi d enda t ie nd s fld ac oft sa lge notc wiht cour.' he consde i am otont dim isunde Rul ie opy hi le d ie t he t' n W i rng i o s s r e 1 b)6)oft Fe r lRul ofCi lPr e e,t c tmus a ce al oft pl ntf 2( ( he de a es vi oc dur he our t c pt 1 he ai ips al gai astueand co tuet le tons r nsr hem i t lghtm os f or e t t pli if'Gome r Ke n, n he i t av abl o he a ntf. ' z . r 201 W L 1 86*1( D. a. a . zol t tngPil v M c 2 0691 S. Fl M r29, zlcii eage . connel, 6F.d 1 1 4 l51 3 282, 28 ( 1hCi. 1 t r 2008).'nt i tntc e,heCourmus ac e t aleg i oft Compli astu )' he nsa as t l t t c pt he l atons he ant r e a t Pl n if a l ge t tt y ha pe f r e a lc tonspr c ntt flng a a ton unde nd he ai t f s le ha he ve r o m d 1 ondii e ede o ii n c i r t eF oi aM ii m W a eAc .Me av Ag- rpr du e I c, 0 W L2 9 2 4*1 ( . F a h lrd nmu g t' s . Ma t o c ,n .20 8 ' 7 0 2 1 M D. l . J y 18, ul 2008) . Be us t Pli ifdiput t alegai t ti f ie t compl wih t saut ' notc ca e he antf s es he l ton ha t al d o y t he t t es ie pr son,hem i m um wag cai c r tbedim is un i t Pl ntf ha ha a opporuniy ovii t ni e l m a mo s s ed tl he ai if s d n t t t pr dee denc ofiscompla e.'Iti sile l i t dicoveyperod, ndt Def nt o ovi vi e t inc ' ) s tl ary n he s r i a he enda s ( ha no de i i l demonsr t dt tt Pl ntf c nnotpr c ve t c svey ta e ha he ai if a ove ompla wiht pr s tnotc ince t he e-ui ie (ore mpl t Pli ifmaybea et e gei dic r oft Def nt'ec dst obt n f xa e,he antf bl o nga n s ovey he enda sr or o ai a c y oft pr s tnotc algedl sntt t Dee ntl'Cury v.Hi S i Famiy op he e-ui ie le y e o he fnda s . r ' gh prngs l Pr tc Clni and Di si Ct.l . 2008 W L 51 acie i c agno s r nc, 57683 #1 ( D.Fl De 9,2008) l t 0 N. a. c. . f he Pli ifi unabl t pr vi s h e de eoft De e ntsr ei oft notc t De e nt antf s e o o de uc vi nc he f nda ' ec pt he i e, he f nda ma b a l t o ti s mmayj d me ta an tt ePli tf o t scam.' twi o tmo e y e be o b an u r u g n g i s h anif n hi li ' Ye t u r h e de e orafi vis t Pl i ifsde a oft De enda s r quese a s i t tpr - ui vi nc fda t , he antf ni l he f nt' e t d dmi sons ha e s t n tc h dn t e np o i e i n te o g t p e e tteg a to s mma yj d me ta an tte oie a o b e r v d d s o n u h o rv n h r n f u r u g n g is h Pl i if' I a ntf . d. ' THE COURT ha c i r d t m o i a t pe tne pori oft r c d, ndbeng s onsde e he ton nd he ri nt tons he e or a i ot ie f l a s d i t pr s ,ti hem s uly dvie n he emies i s ADJUDGED t tt m o i i DENI . ha he ton s ED D ON E AN D O RD ERED i Cham be s a M i m i Fl i t n r t a , orda, hi FEDE CH l Copi pr de t es ovi d o: Col s lofRe r m e co d - 2- da ofJ y une,201 2. . O REN O I TED STATES D I STRI J GE CT UD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?