Navarro v. BJ Retreader Tires, Inc. et al
Filing
20
ORDER DENYING 16 MOTION for Reconsideration re 14 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Chief Judge Federico A. Moreno on 6/19/2012. (mmz)
UNI
TED STATES DI
STRI COURT FOR THE
CT
SOU TH ERN D I
STRI O F FLO RI
CT
DA
M i m iD i son
a
vi i
C as N um be 1 21
e
r: 2- 005- V- O R EN O
CI M
M I EL A . A VA RRO ,
GU
N
Pl i if
a ntf ,
VS.
BJRETREADER TI
RES I
NC.a LORENZO
nd
BUI
TRON ,i vi l
ndi dualy,
Def nda s
e nt .
ORDER DENYI DEFENDANTS'M O TI TO RECONSI
NG
ON
DER ORDER DENYI
NG
D EFEN DA N TS'M O TI N T O D I I C O UN T I
O
SM SS
V
THI CAUSE ca be or t Co t upon t Def nt 'Cons i t M oton t
S
me f e he ur
he
enda s
oldaed
i o
Re i Or rDe ng M oton t Dim isCou I an M oton t Sti Pl ntf Res e
consder de nyi
i o s s
nt V d
i o rke ai ifs pons
t Mo int Dimisf rF a dUp nt eCo r ( E. .1 ) fldo Ju 5 20 2
o to o s s o r u o h u tD. No 6 , ie n ne . 1 .
TheDef nt ha a gue t CountI s dbedim is dbe us i ne rr ce ve t
enda s ve r d hat
V houl
s s e ca e t ve e i d he
notc lte t tPli ifwa r quiedt s nd t m bef e tlng acl m u
ie e tr ha antf s e r o e he
or ii
ai nderFl St .
a. at
j448. 1 6)a ( 11.
1 0( ()20 )Howe rt Pli ifalgest ipr de Def ntwihnotc a ha
ve ,he antf le hatt ovi d enda t ie nd s
fld ac oft sa lge notc wiht cour.' he consde i am otont dim isunde Rul
ie opy hi le d ie t he
t' n
W
i rng
i o s s
r e
1 b)6)oft Fe r lRul ofCi lPr e e,t c tmus a ce al oft pl ntf
2( (
he de a
es
vi oc dur he our
t c pt 1 he ai ips
al gai astueand co tuet
le tons r
nsr hem i t lghtm os f or e t t pli if'Gome r Ke n,
n he i
t av abl o he a ntf.
'
z . r
201 W L 1 86*1( D. a. a . zol t tngPil v M c
2
0691
S. Fl M r29, zlcii eage . connel, 6F.d 1 1 4
l51 3 282, 28
( 1hCi.
1 t r 2008).'nt i tntc e,heCourmus ac e t aleg i oft Compli astu
)' he nsa as t
l
t t c pt he l atons he
ant r e
a t Pl n if a l ge t tt y ha pe f r e a lc tonspr c ntt flng a a ton unde
nd he ai t f s le ha he ve r o m d 1 ondii
e ede o ii n c i
r
t eF oi aM ii m W a eAc .Me av Ag- rpr du e I c, 0 W L2 9 2 4*1 ( . F a
h lrd nmu
g t' s . Ma t o c ,n .20 8
'
7 0 2 1 M D. l .
J y 18,
ul 2008)
.
Be us t Pli ifdiput t alegai t ti f ie t compl wih t saut ' notc
ca e he antf s es he l ton ha t al d o
y t he t t es ie
pr son,hem i m um wag cai c r tbedim is un i t Pl ntf ha ha a opporuniy
ovii t
ni
e l m a mo
s s ed tl he ai if s d n
t t
t pr dee denc ofiscompla e.'Iti sile l i t dicoveyperod, ndt Def nt
o ovi vi e t
inc ' ) s tl ary n he s r i a he enda s
(
ha no de i i l demonsr t dt tt Pl ntf c nnotpr c
ve t c svey
ta e ha he ai if a
ove ompla wiht pr s tnotc
ince t he e-ui ie
(ore mpl t Pli ifmaybea et e gei dic r oft Def nt'ec dst obt n
f xa e,he antf
bl o nga n s ovey he enda sr or o ai
a c y oft pr s tnotc algedl sntt t Dee ntl'Cury v.Hi S i Famiy
op
he e-ui ie le y e o he fnda s . r
'
gh prngs
l
Pr tc Clni and Di si Ct.l . 2008 W L 51
acie i c
agno s r nc,
57683 #1 ( D.Fl De 9,2008) l t
0 N. a. c.
. f he
Pli ifi unabl t pr vi s h e de eoft De e ntsr ei oft notc t De e nt
antf s
e o o de uc vi nc
he f nda ' ec pt he i e, he f nda
ma b a l t o ti s mmayj d me ta an tt ePli tf o t scam.' twi o tmo e
y e be o b an u r u g n g i s h anif n hi li '
Ye t u r
h
e de e orafi vis t Pl i ifsde a oft De enda s r quese a s i t tpr - ui
vi nc
fda t , he antf
ni l he f nt' e t d dmi sons ha e s t
n tc h dn t e np o i e i n te o g t p e e tteg a to s mma yj d me ta an tte
oie a o b e r v d d s o n u h o rv n h r n f u r u g n g is h
Pl i if' I
a ntf . d.
'
THE COURT ha c i r d t m o i a t pe tne pori oft r c d, ndbeng
s onsde e he ton nd he ri nt tons he e or a
i
ot ie f l a s d i t pr s ,ti
hem s uly dvie n he emies i s
ADJUDGED t tt m o i i DENI .
ha he ton s
ED
D ON E AN D O RD ERED i Cham be s a M i m i Fl i t
n
r t a , orda, hi
FEDE
CH l
Copi pr de t
es ovi d o:
Col s lofRe r
m e
co d
-
2-
da ofJ
y
une,201
2.
. O REN O
I
TED STATES D I
STRI J GE
CT UD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?