Hervis v. City of Miami

Filing 12

ORDER denying as moot 8 Motion to Dismiss. See attached ORDER for details. Signed by Judge Robert N. Scola, Jr. on 8/9/12. (jky)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 12-22418-Civ-SCOLA MIGUEL A. HERVIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF MIAMI, Defendant. _________________________/ ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant City of Miami’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 8], filed on August 3, 2012. Subsequently, on August 9, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [ECF No. 10]. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) allows a party to amend the pleadings “once as a matter of course” if done within “21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b),” whichever comes first. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). “For purposes of this Rule, a motion to dismiss is not a responsive pleading.” Williams v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Ga., 477 F.3d 1282, 1291 (11th Cir. 2007). Here, the Plaintiff filed the Amended Complaint six days after Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss. Therefore, Plaintiff’s amendment must be allowed as a matter of course, and does not require permission from the Court. “When the plaintiff has the right to file an amended complaint as a matter of course,” which is the case here, “the plain language of Rule 15(a) shows that the court lacks the discretion to reject the amended complaint[.]” See id. at 1293 n.6 (emphasis original). Further, because Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint supersedes the prior Complaint, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the original Complaint is now moot. See Taylor v. Alabama, 275 F. App’x 836, 838 (Cir. 11th 2008) (noting that when “Plaintiffs amended their complaint,” the “Defendants’ motion to dismiss became moot”). Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 8] is DENIED AS MOOT, in light of the newly-filed Amended Complaint. DONE and ORDERED in chambers, at Miami, Florida August 9, 2012. ________________________________ ROBERT N. SCOLA, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: U.S. Magistrate Judge Counsel of record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?