UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
Filing
307
ORDER denying 305 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Patricia A. Seitz on 6/11/2014. (cqs)
UNI
TED STATES DI
STRI COURT
CT
SO UTHERN DI
STRI OF FLORI
CT
DA
CA SE NO.1 22958 C1 SEl TURNOFF
2- V- TZ/
UNI
TED STATES OF AM ERI ,
CA
Pl ntf,
ai if
VS.
SECRETARY,FLORI DEPARTM ENT OF
DA
CORRECTI
ONS, e a1,
t .
Def nda s
e nt .
ORDER DENYI M OTI TO STAY
NG
ON
THI M ATTER i bef r t Cou to t De enda s'Re w e M oton f PartalSt y
S
s o e he
r n he f nt
ne d
i or i a
oft Co tsJ y 1, 2 4I e n ainDae( 3 5 . Dee d n sp e iusyflda
he ur ' ul
01 mplme tto t DE- 0 1 fn a t rvo l ie n
Ame e Mo inf rPa t lS a ( 26 ) h ts ug tasa o teJ y 1 2014 i em ent i
nd d to o ri ty DE- 0 t a o h ty f h ul ,
a
mpl
aton
de dlnei f
a i n avorofaqua try pha e i sa tngi Ocobe 201 and c m i tng o J y 1
re l
s -n t ri n t r 4
ul na i n ul ,
201 Atahea i on t Am e d M oton, t Cour t dt pari st ti di notha
5.
rng he
nde
i he
t ol he te ha t d
ve
j rs it nt is ea o d rsa i gt eJ l 1 2014 deadlne and or ri t quarerl phase-n
u idci o su n r e tyn h uy ,
o
i
de ng he
t y
i
b c u eteP ei n r lj n to c n anngt eJ l 1 2014 deadlne i curenty on appealt
e a s h r l ay n u cin o tii h uy ,
mi
i s r l
o
t Elve h Cic t Thus De e
he e nt r ui.
, f ndan sc r ntm otonno l rs eksan or radd e sngt
t ure
i
onge e
de
r s i he
qua t ry pha e i
re l
s -n,
Att hea i a i isor rde i t Ame d M o i t St y t Cour or r
he rng nd n t de nyng he
nde
ton o a he
t de ed
,
t pari t fl am o i f pa talr m a wih t El ve h Cic tbe
he tes o ie
ton or ri e nd t he e nt r ui ca
us a pa talr m a
e
ri e nd
woul al t Co tt m odiy t J y 1, 201 i pl m e a i da e i t Pr lm i r
d low he ur o
f he ul
4 m e nt ton t n he e i na y
Ij tont pemi aqua trypha ei
n unci o r t
rel s -n.TheDee nt Rene dM otonsae t t
fnda s' we
i tts ha
Defnda swilno s k t pa ta r ma a , i ta s kso y t e r ofasa oft
e nt l t ee he ril e nd nd nse d, ee nl he nty
ty he
i plm e ai de dlne, wihoutam odii ton oft i e nt ton dea i
m e nt ton a i
t
fcai
he mpl me a i
dlne
.
H owever t
, he
Cour wilno smpl e e asa oft i e t ton de i b aus i cannotrel on
t l t i y ntr t y he mpl men a i
adlne ec e t
y
De e nt r pr s nt tonst ti wilc i t i eme isr i o di tpr r m i a
f nda s' e e e ai ha t l ontnue o mpl nt t elgi us e og n n
t l f s in.At h Prl n r lj n to h aig Def ndant winess t tfed t tt
i y a ho
me
t e ei ay nu cin e rn , e
mi
s' t es esii ha he
De e nt had e r i e i t ha asa e der i o m e l pr
f nda s
ve y nt nton o ve t t wi elgi us a s og
r m by Se e be or
a
pt m r
Oc obe 201 whieot r sa e t tt pr r m woul be sa ewi byt be l ngof201
t r 3, l he s t t d ha he og a
d
tt de he gimi
4
.
De pie t s r pr e a i , o y o c r to lf ciiy ha i eme e ar lg ousdit
s t he e e es nttons nl ne oreci na a lt d mpl nt d ei i
e
pr a byt be r ng of201 a t tf ciiy ha bee or r d t do s byt Elve h
ogr m
he gimi
4 nd ha a lt d n de e o
o he e nt
Cic ti a s pa a e c e. Des t t i ndi J y 1 201 de i f sa e de
r ui n e r t as
pie he mpe ng ul ,
4 adlne or t t wi
i pl m e a i , Def nda shavei e t t r lgi di pr a a o y aha ul
m e nt ton
e nt
mpl men ed he e i ous et ogr m t nl
ndf
of
f c lte ,l vi 51i tt i a a s it d f iii sr mai ngt i
a iiis ea ng
nsiutons nd s oca e aclte e ni o
mplm e t r i ous
e nt he elgi
di pr a .
et ogr m
TheCour haspr vi l r pr s nt d t t pa test ti i wilng t modiy t
t
e ousy e e e e o he ri ha t s li o
f he
i e e a i de i butcamotdo s wiho apa ta r ma fom t eEl ve h Cicui.
mplm ntton adlne
r
o t ut ril e nd r h e nt r t
Defnd sha deci d t s ek s h ar mand. Cons que l i i
e ant ve lne o e uc e
e nty, t s
ORDERED t tDef nda s Re
ha
e nt ' newe M oton f Pa ta St y oft Cour ' J y 1 201
d
i or ri l a
he
ts ul , 4
I lme tto Dae( 3 5 i DE ED.
mp e n ain t DE- 0 J s NI
DONE a ORDERED i M i mi Foia ti
nd
n a , lrd ,hs
// dyo J ne 2 4.
a f u , 01
=
PA T CI A .SEI
A
TZ
UN I
TED STA TES D I I J G E
STR CT UD
c
c:
A1 Couns lofRec d
l
e
or
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?