Humphrey v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
Filing
4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE and DENYING ALL PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge Federico A. Moreno on 10/22/2012.(mmd)
UN I
TED STA TES D I
STRI T COU RT FOR THE
C
SOUTHERN DI
STRI OF FLORI
CT
DA
M im iDi son
a
vi i
Cas Num be 1 23759- V- 0% N0
e
r: 2C1 M
KENNETH D.
HUM PHREY,e al,
/ .
Pli if ,
antfs
VS.
JANET NAPO LI
TAN O, Sec et y
r ar
De rme ofHomelnd Sec iy,
pa t nt
a
urt
Def nt
enda .
/
ORDER DI I NG CASE AND DENYI ALL PENDI M OTI
SM SSI
NG
NG
ONS AS M OOT
-
THI CAUSE c
S
amebef et Cour upon as s ee m i ton oft r or . Fort
or he
t
ua pont xa na i
he ec d
he
r as s tf t be o ,hi c ei DI I
e ons e orh l w t s as s SM SSED .Addii ly, a1pe ngm otonsar DENI
tona l 1 ndi
i
e
ED
A S M OO T.
l hsi o mapa pe i c mplitt ePlitf atmpst alg RI camsa an t h
n i nf r
u rs o an ,h an if te t o le e CO li g is t e
Unied St t De rme ofHom elnd Se urt . I r di t m a a lga i i Pl i ifs
t
aes pa t nt
a
c iy n ea ng he ny le tons n antf
c
ompli ,t Cour c
ant he
t annotdice n af der lRI c us ofa ton.
s r e a CO a e c i
Un e 2 U. C. 1 5e ( )B)i, c u tth ld s s teLn o mapa pe i a to )a
d r 8 S. j 91 ()2 ( ()a o r รง al imis h if r
s
u rs cin t
a tm ei t cou tdee m i t t. .hea ton ...i fi ouso m a ii .' Acc di t t
ny i f he r tr nes ha . t c i
s rvol
r lc ous ' or ng o he
Unie St t Supr me Cour,aco pl nti fi ous' r i lc a a guabl ba i i lw or
td aes
e
t
m ai s rvol ' e t a ks n r
whe
e ss n a
i f t' Neiz e v Wilams, U . 31 , 325( 989) dicusi dimis sunder or rs to
n ac .
' t k . li
490 S. 9
1 ( s sng s sal
f me ecin
1 5d) whih co ane t s me lngua a cure scton 1 15( ( ( (). A co tma
91 ( , c nti d he a a ge s rnt e i 9 e)2)B)i)
ur y
dimiscl msunders ton 1 5()2)B)i wheet cli r ton a i s a ymeil s
s s ai
eci 91 e ( ( () r he ams es
n ndiputbl rtes
l ga t or ora ecomprs off cua con e i t ta e cea l bas es . 1 a 327.
e l he y r
ied a t l t ntons ha r l ry el s d. t
I Ne tke t Supr m eCour pr de s ve a e mpl soffi o orm ai i cai .
n iz , he
e
t ovi d e r l xa e
rvol us
lcous l ms
W he e t defndanti cl ry i mune fo s t orwher t pl ntf alegesi rnge e ofa
r he e
s ea l m
r m ui,
e he ai if l
nfi m nt
lga i er s whih obvi l doe note s,he t cl m i f
e l nt e t c
ousy s
xit t n he ai s oundedonani s t bl m e il s
ndipu a y rte s
lgalt or I a 327. Cl ms de alng f nt tc ordel i
e he y. d. t
ai
t ii a asi
usonals na i fti o t f t ly
ce ros i nt he ac ua l
ba ees caeg y.l a 3 28.Fi ly, hi Cour alo no est tapr s pl i ifmus begi n
s l s t or d. t 27na l t s
t s t ha
o e antf
t
ve
g e trle yi pla n h rc mpan .Han sv Ke n r 4 4U. 51 ( 97 )
r ae e wa n e dig e o lit ie . r e , 0 S. 9 1 2 .
M id u o t s p icpe , h Co r p o e d t e laePlitf si f r pa pe i
n f l f he e rn ils t e u t r c e s o vau t anif n o ma u rs
c pl i . Pl ntf com pl ntcont nsa lt ofa l ga i aga ns t Gove nm ent M uc of
om a nt ai ifs
ai
ai
iany le tons i t he
r
.
h
t c
he ompl nti i ohe enta ev a t a c r ulr vi i i difc tt fnd ale i t
ai s nc r
nd en fer a ef e ew t s fi ul o i
lgatons hat
s
uppor ac eofa ton u rt c vi RI sa ut Pli ifscompli i fi ousunde 28
t aus
c i nde he i l CO tt e. antf
ant s rvol
r
U. C. 1 5 e( )B)i b c u eid e n t o ti 'nag a eba i i 1w o i fc . Netk ,
S. j 91 ()2 ( () e a s t o s o c n an ' r u bl ss n a r n a t' i e
a
' z
490 U . a 327. Afe r vi ng t e ie c
S. t
tr e ewi he ntr ompli ,t Cour concudest tt cli s a e
ant he
t
l
ha he am r
i s a y me ils .Ac di y,ti
ndiput bl rte s cor ngl i s
ADJUDGED t tt s ca e i DI I
ha hi s s SM SSED ,a a lpendi motons a e DENI AS
nd 1
ng
i
r
ED
M OOT. Thi c e i CLOSED.
s as s
o xEx oo uoic-b--ui sli,ipp--ot-,o2
o x =s - h---t - r-d t- yf-b-21.
-i --h
.-
FEDE
.
0
UN I D STATES D I
T
STRI J G E
CT UD
Copispr de t
e ovi d o:
Couns ofRe or
el
c d
-
2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?