MURABITO et al v. YOUR DELIVERY MVM CORP. et al

Filing 46

ORDER Approving Settlement Agreement re 1 Complaint, filed by ARIEL D. MURABITO, HORACIO D. HURTADO; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommends that the case be dismissed with prejudice and that the Court retain jurisdiction until 8/15/15. ( Objections to R&R due by 5/5/2014) Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 4/16/2014. (mms) Modified text on 4/16/2014 to correct date per chambers (mno).

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 13-23397-CIV-ALTONAGA/O'SULLIVAN
ARIEL D. MURABITO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
YOUR DELIVERY MVM CORP., et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CASE BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
THIS MATTER came before the Court sua sponte following a settlement
conference before the undersigned and the Court having conducted a hearing
concerning the settlement.
THE COURT has heard from counsel and considered the terms of the
Settlement Agreements, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully
advised in the premises.
This case involves a claim for unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair
Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq ("FLSA"). In reviewing a settlement of an
FLSA private claim, a court must "scrutiniz[e] the settlement for fairness," and
determine that the settlement is a "fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute
over FLSA provisions." Lynn Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-53
(11th Cir. 1982). A settlement entered into in an adversarial context where both sides
are represented by counsel throughout litigation "is more likely to reflect a reasonable
compromise of disputed issues." Id. The district court may approve the settlement in
order to promote the policy of encouraging settlement of litigation. Id. at 1354.

In this case, there is a bona fide factual dispute as to the number of overtime
hours worked by the plaintiffs. The Court has reviewed the terms of the Settlement
Agreements including the amount to be received by the plaintiffs and the attorney’s fees
and costs to be received by counsel and finds that the compromise reached by the
parties is a fair and reasonable resolution of the parties' bona fide disputes.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties' Settlement Agreement (including
attorney’s fees and costs) is hereby APPROVED. It is further
RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed with prejudice and that the Court
retain jurisdiction until August 15, 2015, to enforce the terms of the settlement.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 16th day of April,
2014.

JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies provided to:
United States District Judge Altonaga
All counsel of record

2