Promenade Plaza Partnership v. Centimark Corporation

Filing 61

ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 37 Motion to StrikeThe Opinions of Plaintiff's Roofing Expert. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 3/31/2015. (jw)

Download PDF
UNI TED STATES D I STRI C OU RT CT SO UTH ERN D I STRI OF FLO RI CT DA CA SE NO .14- 22784- 1 cvK NG THE PROM ENADE PLAZA PARTNERSHI P, a Fl i parne s p, orda t r hi Pl i if antf, CENTI ARK COR. . a f ei cor aton, M P , or gn por i D e e nt f nda . / OR DER D ENYI W I NG THO UT PREJUDI DEFENDANT' M O TI N TO STR I E CE S O K TH E OPI O NS OF PLAI FF' RO O FI EXPERT NI NTI S NG THI CAU SE comes bef e t Cour upon Def nda Ce i ar sDauber M oto S or he t e nt ntm k' t in t S rke t Opni s o Pli ifs Rooi g Ex e t J hn L.Br wn ( 3 ) Th sa to o ti he i on f antf' tn p r, o o DE 7 . i cin c er a r s t m t tCentm a k i t l ove Pr enade' s onc ns oof ys e ha i r nsaled r om s hoppi ce e i 2005 ng nt r n a 2006.Pr e nd om nade br oughtt s ac i f r da ages ale ng va i def c s i t r hi ton o m l gi rous e t n he oof s tm t t we e S oxi ael ca ed by t i ope consr i and/ f l e of t yse ha r i pr m t y us he mpr r tucton or aiur he RoofSysem ,'a wel ast us ofi ope m at ra s Pr e t ' s l he e mpr r e i l . om nade a s cont ndst tce t n lo e ha rai r par Ce i a k pe f m ed i 201 have c ed orc rbut d t c t n r def c s e is ntm r r or n 2 aus ont i e o erai oof e t . Pr me de hie a r fn e pe t J n Br wn who o n s t a t the r f i o na r d ooi g x r, oh o , pie h t f l oo s g e re i pr xpe inc ng oductf l e'ca e by Ce i ar s i ope i t l i us ofm a e i s aiur ' us d ntm k' mpr r nsalaton, e t ral, a r pais DE 42,a 1 nd e r . t 4-24.Si fc nty,he opi t a oxi a ey 93% oft r gnii a l nes hat ppr m t l he oof s se i we,a d t tSdj et t ef ie me r n a d i o ry rpar d c r s mp e , y tm s t n ha û u o h al d mb a e n mpr pe l e ie o e a ls l open lp,t o bule hol a one punc u e peror ed by Ce i ar whi h e se on t a w l t es nd tr f m ntm k c xit d he Ce i a k RoofSys e f om 2012 t 201 i i ouro ni t tt Centm a k RoofSysem ntm r tm r o 4, t s pi on ha he i r t f l s ei e be wee 201 a 201 and i i nee of r a m ent' DE 42, a 20. aied om tm t n 2 nd 4 sn d epl ce .' t Acc di t Br or ng o own' e e i CV,he i ça lce ed r i c r c or wih 44 yea s s xt nsve s i i ns oofng onta t t r expe i rence i a lphas s ofc m e cal i t i a r i ntalr i a watr oofng n l e om r i , ndusral nd esde i oofng nd e pr i s t s' He hasbe a m e be of a ha s ved on t boa d of diec or of num er ysem . ' en m r , nd s er he r r t s , ous buidi a r i pr e s o as oci i .He ha s ve asan e r wine s i doze l ng nd oofng of s i nal s atons s er d xpe t t s n ns of c es.Centm a k doe not diput Br as i r s s e own' qua i atons Ra her Ce i a k m oves t s lsc i . t , ntm r o e l hi opi onson t gr xcude s ni he oundst tt y a e concl ol a wihouta expl ton of ha he r us ' nd t y, ny ana i t m e hodol us t r h t . he t ogy ed o eac hem l Br n own' exper r po t he a a as oc a e sa e t t t y Si peced t r s t e r, nd n s i t t t ha he ûns t he oof as embl a cons t w ih Cl ar I pec i Se vi I ,aM er D a Count a ove s y nd uled t e y ns ton r ce, nc. to de y ppr d t tng l at y,t peror a c r ntm oit e s r ' DE 42,a 1 They r ewed m a esi abor or o f m ur e sur u vey.' t 6. evi ny doc e s i l ng m oit e s ve conduc e i 2006 a 201 1 at 17.The alo um nt , ncudi sur ur ys td n nd 2. d. y s i pec e t Centm a k RoofSys e on J ns t d he i r tm anuar 8,201 M a 7,201 Sept m be 5,201 y 4; y 4; e r 4; a Se e ber 8, 201 The w e e pr ent durng t m oit e s ve and c e c s nd pt m 4. y r es i he sur ur y or ut pe f m e by Cl r f a 1 Br r or d ea y. #. t 8. own r i on hi pe s eled s r onali pe i ,t doc ns ctons he ument t t s ha her viwed,a t Cl r I pec i Re tt f m hi concl i . e e nd he ea y ns ton por o or s usons Sfhe i l e s oned by Rul 702 ...i a fe bl one ...The f ,ofcour e t' nquiy nvii e s l xi e . ocus s, mus be s el on prncpl s a m ehodol t ol y i i e nd t ogy,noton t concl i t t t gene a e. he usons ha hey rt ' ' Dau e tv M e r l Dt Pha ma e tc l,I c,5 U. 5 9,5 4 95 ( 9 ) TheCo r h s b r . r el p w r c uias n . 09 S. 7 9 - 1 93 . ut a ca ef l r viwed Br r uly e e own' e s xper r por a r t lr por.Br t e t nd ebuta e t own' opi ons a t t s ni s o he curent c ton oft r a e r i y ba ed on hi per ona ,viuali pe tons a on r ondii he oof r elabl s s s l s ns c i nd sur ur y. f nt e i l s e he ela lt hes Clar s m oit e s ve De enda does not s rousy diput t r ibiiy of t e e y' m e hods a i ed f uls Br t , nd nde a t own c el f notafor ng due wei t ot r sudi and hi ty or f di ght o he t es m oit e s ve t whi Centm a k woul have hi a c i gr atr c e nc See Kumho sur ur ys o ch i r d m s rbe e e r de e. Tie Co.v Ca mih l 5 U. 1 7 1 6 ( 9 )( it )(io on d n e t a a e pe t r . r c ae, 26 S. 3 , 5 1 99 dca û n e e is h t n x r mi dr w a concl i fom a s t of obs r i bas d on e ensve and s alzed ght a uson r e e vatons e xt i peci i e peinc .) x re e' . ' The Cour ac t know l edges t ce t n of Br hat rai own' ca a i opi ons a e s ewha s us ton ni r om t vaguel sa e a t t quesi ofhow he r ac t e c usonsc d be e ai y t t d, nd hat he ton e hed hes oncl i oul xpl ned mo e rg r usy.S e DE 4 t2 (r u t t e fie me r n a d i r pe l r p ie r ioo l e 2,a 0 i e o h ald mb a e n mp o ry e ar d cor s mpl ...t Ce i a k Roof Sys e f ld s e i e be we e a es he ntm r t m aie om tm t en 201 and 2 201 ....'.Ye Ce i r hasnots 4 ' t ntma k ) hown t tBr sopi onsar s unr ibl t t y ha own' ni e o ela e hat he s d be sr c n i t i entr y.A c di y,t Cour de es Centm a k' m oton t houl ti ke n her iet cor ngl he t ni i r s i o srkewi u p eu iet riea p o raeo j cinsa til Ce tma k i o c refe t ti t t rj d c o as p r p it b e to t ra . n i r s f ou s r e o ho e oi a pe ce ved i xpl t ny r i ncons se esori dequacis i Br it nci na e n own' t tm ony atti by c os s es i ral r s e m i ton. xa na i Ce i ar a s m ovest e l ose i y new opi onst Br ntm k l o o xcude t nsbl ni hat own ofe e f t f r d or he frttmei hi r b ta rpo t c ntay t Fe r lRu eofCii Pr c du e 2 ( )2 ( (i. is i n s e u tl e r, o r r o dea l v l o e r 6 a ( )D)i) The fr tofBr is own' os e i y ne r t opi ons i t ti he i opersope c ed t s t ns bl w ebutal ni s ha ' mpr t l aus he f i r o t r of'DE 3 ,a 1 I Br wn' i ta e p r d s l s r ,he sae t tû the al e f he o ' u 7 t 7. n o s niil x e t ic o u e tt s ha l j l r ha poor sope at s r l tons' conta y t t Fl i Buidi Code,w hi h oof s l eve al oca i , ' r r o he orda l ng c û e r pos tve s ope t dr n orm a e i s a ove f poor dr na even on r r s' i quies ii l r o ai t ral ppr d or ai ge e-oof .' DE 42,a 1 The Cour c l s t t t s s a e e ,t he wih Ce i a k' e r ' t 8. t onc ude ha hi t t m nt oget r t ntm r s xpe ts d s u so ofso e( 4 a 4 - ) r n r Br wn' c u ai nr ma ksi r b t l o r ic s in lp DE 2, t 3 44 , e des o s a s to e r n e uta pr pe unde Rul 26.The s ond of Br r e ec own' ose i y new r t opi ons i hi ca aly s t nsbl ebutal ni s s us l r l i Ce i a k' ale d i pr rpathi and t f ii mem br t t f l eoft eatng ntm r s l ge m ope c ng he a lng ane o he aiur he r o s se DE 3 ,a 1 Ce tmak' o j ci n o t e e po n si wi u me i.Br wn o f y tm. 7 t 7. n i r s b e to n h s i t s t t rt o ho ce ry d e ofe t s o nins i h s iii lr po t DE 42 a 2 (Du t t e f ie lal o s fr he e pi o n i nta e r. , t 0 t e o h ald f me br ne a m a nd i pr ry r par d c e s m pl ...he Ce i a k Roof Sysem m ope l e ie or a es t ntm r t f i d.. .) al .' . e ' The e or i i O RD ERED , A DJUDGED, and DECREED t Ce i ar s r f e, t s hat ntm k' Dauber M otont Sti t Opi onsofPli ifsRoofng Expe t J L.Br ( 37) t i o rke he ni antf b r, ohn own DE b ,a t e s me i,hee y DENI wiho pr j c t r ie a p o rae o j cinsa e nd h a s r b ED t ut e udie o as p r p it b e to t ti l ra . D ONE and O RDERED i Cha ber a t J m e La e e Ki Feder J tc n m s t he a s wr nc ng al us ie Buidi a Unie St t sCourhous M i m i Fl i t s31 tda ofM a c 201 l ng nd t d a e t e, a , orda, hi s y r h, 5. e - x V M ES LA W REN CE KI NG I TED STA TES DI STRI J GE CT SOUTHERN DI STRI OF F RI A CT D cc: A1 Couns ofRec d 1 el or

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?