Promenade Plaza Partnership v. Centimark Corporation
Filing
61
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice 37 Motion to StrikeThe Opinions of Plaintiff's Roofing Expert. Signed by Senior Judge James Lawrence King on 3/31/2015. (jw)
UNI
TED STATES D I
STRI C OU RT
CT
SO UTH ERN D I
STRI OF FLO RI
CT
DA
CA SE NO .14- 22784- 1
cvK NG
THE PROM ENADE PLAZA PARTNERSHI
P,
a Fl i parne s p,
orda t r hi
Pl i if
antf,
CENTI ARK COR. . a f ei cor aton,
M
P , or gn por i
D e e nt
f nda .
/
OR DER D ENYI W I
NG
THO UT PREJUDI DEFENDANT' M O TI N TO STR I E
CE
S
O
K
TH E OPI O NS OF PLAI FF' RO O FI EXPERT
NI
NTI S
NG
THI CAU SE comes bef e t Cour upon Def nda Ce i ar sDauber M oto
S
or he
t
e nt ntm k'
t
in
t S rke t Opni s o Pli ifs Rooi g Ex e t J hn L.Br wn ( 3 ) Th sa to
o ti he i on f antf'
tn p r, o
o DE 7 . i cin
c er a r s t m t tCentm a k i t l ove Pr enade' s
onc ns oof ys e ha
i r nsaled
r om
s hoppi ce e i 2005
ng nt r n
a 2006.Pr e
nd
om nade br
oughtt s ac i f r da ages ale ng va i def c s i t r
hi ton o m
l gi
rous e t n he oof
s tm t t we e S oxi ael ca ed by t i ope consr i and/ f l e of t
yse ha
r i
pr m t y us
he mpr r
tucton
or aiur
he
RoofSysem ,'a wel ast us ofi ope m at ra s Pr e
t ' s l he e mpr r e i l . om nade a s cont ndst tce t n
lo
e
ha rai
r par Ce i a k pe f m ed i 201 have c ed orc rbut d t c t n r def c s
e is ntm r r or
n
2
aus
ont i e o erai oof e t .
Pr me de hie a r fn e pe t J n Br wn who o n s t a t the r f i
o na
r d ooi g x r, oh o ,
pie h t f l oo s
g
e re i pr
xpe inc ng oductf l e'ca e by Ce i ar s i ope i t l i us ofm a e i s
aiur ' us d
ntm k' mpr r nsalaton, e
t ral,
a r pais DE 42,a 1
nd e r .
t 4-24.Si fc nty,he opi t a oxi a ey 93% oft r
gnii a l
nes hat ppr m t l
he oof
s se i we,a d t tSdj et t ef ie me r n a d i o ry rpar d c r s mp e ,
y tm s t n ha û u o h al d mb a e n mpr pe l e ie o e a ls
l
open lp,t o bule hol a one punc u e peror ed by Ce i ar whi h e se on t
a w
l t es nd
tr
f m
ntm k
c xit d
he
Ce i a k RoofSys e f om 2012 t 201 i i ouro ni t tt Centm a k RoofSysem
ntm r
tm r
o
4, t s
pi on ha he
i r
t
f l s ei e be wee 201 a 201 and i i nee of r a m ent' DE 42, a 20.
aied om tm
t n
2 nd
4
sn
d
epl ce
.'
t
Acc di t Br
or ng o own' e e i CV,he i ça lce ed r i c r c or wih 44 yea s
s xt nsve
s i i ns oofng onta t
t
r
expe i
rence i a lphas s ofc m e cal i t i a r i ntalr i a watr oofng
n l
e
om r i , ndusral nd esde i oofng nd e pr i
s t s' He hasbe a m e be of a ha s ved on t boa d of diec or of num er
ysem .
'
en
m r , nd s er
he
r
r t s ,
ous
buidi a r i pr e s o as oci i .He ha s ve asan e r wine s i doze
l ng nd oofng of s i nal s atons
s er d
xpe t t s n
ns
of c es.Centm a k doe not diput Br
as
i r
s
s e own' qua i atons Ra her Ce i a k m oves t
s
lsc i . t , ntm r
o
e l hi opi onson t gr
xcude s ni
he oundst tt y a e concl ol a wihouta expl ton of
ha he r
us ' nd t
y,
ny
ana i
t m e hodol us t r h t .
he t
ogy ed o eac hem
l Br
n own' exper r po t he a a as oc a e sa e t t t y Si peced t r
s
t e r,
nd n s i t t t ha he ûns t he oof
as embl a cons t w ih Cl ar I pec i Se vi I ,aM er D a Count a ove
s
y nd
uled t e y ns ton r ce, nc.
to de
y ppr d
t tng l at y,t peror a c r ntm oit e s r ' DE 42,a 1 They r ewed m a
esi abor or o f m
ur e
sur u vey.'
t 6.
evi
ny
doc e s i l ng m oit e s ve conduc e i 2006 a 201 1 at 17.The alo
um nt , ncudi
sur ur ys
td n
nd
2. d.
y s
i pec e t Centm a k RoofSys e on J
ns t d he
i r
tm
anuar 8,201 M a 7,201 Sept m be 5,201
y
4; y
4;
e r
4;
a Se e ber 8, 201 The w e e pr ent durng t m oit e s ve and c e c s
nd pt m
4.
y
r es
i he
sur ur y
or ut
pe f m e by Cl r f a 1 Br
r or d
ea y. #. t 8. own r i on hi pe s
eled
s r onali pe i ,t doc
ns ctons he ument t t
s ha
her viwed,a t Cl r I pec i Re tt f m hi concl i .
e e
nd he ea y ns ton por o or s
usons
Sfhe i l e s oned by Rul 702 ...i a fe bl one ...The f ,ofcour e
t' nquiy nvii
e
s l xi e
.
ocus
s,
mus be s el on prncpl s a m ehodol
t
ol y
i i e nd t
ogy,noton t concl i t t t gene a e.
he
usons ha hey
rt '
'
Dau e tv M e r l Dt Pha ma e tc l,I c,5 U. 5 9,5 4 95 ( 9 ) TheCo r h s
b r . r el p
w r c uias n . 09 S. 7 9 - 1 93 .
ut a
ca ef l r viwed Br
r uly e e
own' e
s xper r por a r t lr por.Br
t e t nd ebuta e t own' opi ons a t t
s ni
s o he
curent c ton oft r a e r i y ba ed on hi per ona ,viuali pe tons a on
r
ondii
he oof r elabl s
s s l s
ns c i
nd
sur ur y. f
nt
e i l s e he ela lt
hes
Clar s m oit e s ve De enda does not s rousy diput t r ibiiy of t e
e y'
m e hods a i ed f uls Br
t
, nd nde a t own c el f notafor ng due wei t ot r sudi and
hi ty or
f di
ght o he t es
m oit e s ve t whi Centm a k woul have hi a c i gr atr c e nc See Kumho
sur ur ys o
ch
i r
d
m s rbe e e r de e.
Tie Co.v Ca mih l 5 U. 1 7 1 6 ( 9 )( it )(io on d n e t a a e pe t
r
. r c ae, 26 S. 3 , 5 1 99 dca û
n e e is h t n x r
mi dr w a concl i fom a s t of obs r i bas d on e ensve and s alzed
ght a
uson r
e
e vatons
e
xt i
peci i
e peinc .)
x re e' .
'
The Cour ac
t know l
edges t ce t n of Br
hat rai
own' ca a i opi ons a e s ewha
s us ton
ni
r om
t
vaguel sa e a t t quesi ofhow he r ac t e c usonsc d be e ai
y t t d, nd hat he
ton
e hed hes oncl i
oul
xpl ned
mo e rg r usy.S e DE 4 t2 (r u t t e fie me r n a d i r pe l r p ie
r ioo l e
2,a 0 i e o h ald mb a e n mp o ry e ar d
cor s mpl ...t Ce i a k Roof Sys e f ld s e i e be we
e a es
he
ntm r
t m aie om tm
t en 201 and
2
201 ....'.Ye Ce i r hasnots
4 ' t ntma k
)
hown t tBr sopi onsar s unr ibl t t y
ha own' ni
e o ela e hat he
s d be sr c n i t i entr y.A c di y,t Cour de es Centm a k' m oton t
houl
ti ke n her iet
cor ngl he
t ni
i r s
i o
srkewi u p eu iet riea p o raeo j cinsa til Ce tma k i o c refe t
ti t t rj d c o as p r p it b e to t ra . n i r s f ou s r e o
ho
e oi a pe ce ved i
xpl t ny r i
ncons se esori dequacis i Br
it nci
na
e n own' t tm ony atti by c os s es i
ral
r s
e m i ton.
xa na i
Ce i ar a s m ovest e l ose i y new opi onst Br
ntm k l o
o xcude t nsbl
ni
hat own ofe e f t
f r d or he
frttmei hi r b ta rpo t c ntay t Fe r lRu eofCii Pr c du e 2 ( )2 ( (i.
is i n s e u tl e r, o r r o dea l
v l o e r 6 a ( )D)i)
The fr tofBr
is
own' os e i y ne r t opi ons i t ti he i opersope c ed t
s t ns bl w ebutal ni
s ha ' mpr
t
l
aus he
f i r o t r of'DE 3 ,a 1 I Br wn' i ta e p r d s l s r ,he sae t tû the
al e f he o '
u
7 t 7. n o s niil x e t ic o u e
tt s ha l j
l
r ha poor sope at s r l tons' conta y t t Fl i Buidi Code,w hi h
oof s
l
eve al oca i ,
'
r r o he orda
l ng
c
û e r pos tve s ope t dr n orm a e i s a ove f poor dr na even on r r s'
i quies ii l
r
o ai
t ral ppr d or
ai ge
e-oof .'
DE 42,a 1 The Cour c l s t t t s s a e e ,t he wih Ce i a k' e r '
t 8.
t onc ude ha hi t t m nt oget r t
ntm r s xpe ts
d s u so ofso e( 4 a 4 - ) r n r Br wn' c u ai nr ma ksi r b t l o r
ic s in lp DE 2, t 3 44 , e des o s a s to e r n e uta pr pe
unde Rul 26.The s ond of Br
r
e
ec
own' ose i y new r t opi ons i hi ca aly
s t nsbl
ebutal ni
s s us l
r l i Ce i a k' ale d i pr rpathi and t f ii mem br t t f l eoft
eatng ntm r s l ge m ope
c ng
he a lng
ane o he aiur
he
r o s se DE 3 ,a 1 Ce tmak' o j ci n o t e e po n si wi u me i.Br wn
o f y tm.
7 t 7. n i r s b e to n h s i t s t t rt o
ho
ce ry d e ofe t s o nins i h s iii lr po t DE 42 a 2 (Du t t e f ie
lal o s fr he e pi o n i nta e r.
, t 0 t e o h ald
f
me br ne a
m a
nd i pr ry r par d c e s m pl ...he Ce i a k Roof Sysem
m ope l e ie
or a es t
ntm r
t
f i d.. .)
al .' .
e
'
The e or i i O RD ERED , A DJUDGED, and DECREED t Ce i ar s
r f e, t s
hat ntm k'
Dauber M otont Sti t Opi onsofPli ifsRoofng Expe t J L.Br ( 37)
t i o rke he ni
antf
b
r, ohn
own DE
b ,a t e s me i,hee y DENI wiho pr j c t r ie a p o rae o j cinsa
e nd h a s r b
ED t ut e udie o as p r p it b e to t
ti l
ra .
D ONE and O RDERED i Cha ber a t J m e La e e Ki Feder J tc
n
m s t he a s wr nc ng
al us ie
Buidi a Unie St t sCourhous M i m i Fl i t s31 tda ofM a c 201
l ng nd t d a e
t e, a , orda, hi s y
r h, 5.
e - x
V
M ES LA W REN CE KI
NG
I
TED STA TES DI
STRI J GE
CT
SOUTHERN DI
STRI OF F RI A
CT
D
cc:
A1 Couns ofRec d
1
el
or
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?