Marjam Supply Company of Florida, LLC et al v. Pliteq, Inc. et al

Filing 381

ORDER ADOPTING 374 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re Motions 307 , 308 , 317 , 359 . Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs' motions for attorneys' fees and bill of costs (DE 307; DE 308; DE 317; DE 359) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. This case remains CLOSED. Signed by Judge Kathleen M. Williams on 3/30/2021. See attached document for full details. (kpe)

Download PDF
Case 1:15-cv-24363-KMW Document 381 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2021 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 15-cv-24363-WILLIAMS MARJAM SUPPLY COMPANY OF FLORIDA, LLC, et al. Plaintiffs/ Counter-Defendants, vs. PLITEQ, INC. and PAUL DOWNEY, Defendants/ Counter-Plaintiffs. ________________________________/ ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Becerra’s report and recommendation on Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs’ motions for attorneys’ fees and costs (the “Report”). (DE 374). In the thorough and well-reasoned Report, Judge Becerra explains that Defendants / Counter-Plaintiffs should be awarded $1,452,430.22 in attorneys’ fees and $36,710.67 in costs. Plaintiffs / Counter-Defendants filed objections to the Report. (DE 380). Upon an independent review of the Report, the objections, the record, and applicable case law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report (DE 374) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 2. Defendants / Counter-Plaintiffs’ motions for attorneys’ fees and bill of costs (DE 307; DE 308; DE 317; DE 359) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 3. Defendants / Counter-Plaintiffs are awarded $1,452,430.22 in attorneys’ fees and $36,710.67 in costs. 4. This case remains CLOSED. Case 1:15-cv-24363-KMW Document 381 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/30/2021 Page 2 of 2 DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, this 30th day of March, 2021. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?