Fernandez v. United States of America
Filing
23
ORDER Adopting 21 Report and Recommendations and DENYING Motion to Vacate. Certificate of Appealability: DENIED. Closing Case. Motions Terminated: 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 28 USC 2255 case re 1 Motion (Complaint) to Vacate/Se t Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by Carlos Abel Fernandez Recommending that this motion to vacate be DENIED, that no certificate of appealability issue, and the. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 7/14/2017. (mmd) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69.
UN I
TED STA TES D I
STRI C OU RT FO R TH E
CT
SOU TH ERN D I
STRI O F FLOR I A
CT
D
M im iDi son
a
vii
Cas N um ber:16e
21465- I - O R EN O
C V M
1320230- - O REN O
CR M
CA RLO S A BEL FERN AN D EZ,
M ova ,
nt
VS.
UNI
TED STATES OF A M ERI ,
CA
Re ponde .
s
nt
O R DER AD O PT I G M AG I
N
STR A TE JU D G E ' R EPO RT A N D RE CO M M E ND A TI N
S
O
A ND D ENY I G M O T I N T O V A CA TE
N
O
TH E M A TTER was r f r e t t H o a e Pa r c A . hie U nie St t s M a sr t
e e r d o he nor bl t i k W t , t d a e
gi t a e
J
udge f a Re ta Rec
, or
por nd
omm e ton on M ova ' M oton t Va a e pur uan t 28 U. C.
nda i
nts
i o ct
s to
S.
2255,fld o Aprl25.201
ie n
i
6.TheM a srt J
gitae udgetl aRe ta Rec
ied
por nd omme ton ( E.
ndai D.
21 on M a 23.2017.TheCour ha rviwe t e iefl a rc d.TheCo thasma a
)
v
t s e e d he ntr ie nd e or
ur
de
d n v rviw o t e is s ta t o j cin t te M a itae J d e s Re o t a d
e o o e e f h sue h t he b e to s o h
g srt u g ' p r n
Re om m e ton pr e ,a bei ot r s f l ad s d i t pr m i es i i
c
nda i
es nt nd ng he wi e uly vi e n he e s , t s
AD JUD GE D t t U nied St t s M a s r t J
ha
t
ae
gi ta e udge Pa r c A . W hie' Re t a
tik
t s por nd
Re om me ton i AFFI ED a ADOPTED .Ac di y,i i
c
nda i s
RM
nd
cor ngl t s
AD JUD G ED t tM ova ' M o i t V a t pur ua t 28 U . C .2255 i D EN I .
ha
nts ton o ca e s nt o
S.
s
ED
The Cour ag ee w ih t M ag s r t J
t r s t he
i t a e udge t tt r a e t e pr di a e of e e t ta l t
ha he e r hr e e c t f ns s ha low he
s ne cn e ha c me t i t i c s . Mo n d e no o j c t t e M a itae J d es
e tn ig n n e n n hs a e
va t o s t be t o h
g srt u g '
r co m e ton t tt t o Fl i agg a t d ba t r c
e m nda i ha he w
orda r va e te y onvi tons s r a pr di a e of e e
ci
e ve s e c t f ns s
unde t Ar Care Crmi Ac. Hi o y obe ton i t t rc
r he med e r i nal t s nl j ci s o he e omme ton t tt
ndai ha he
Cour fnd t e Fl i c i e of t e i tng a of i r w ih vi e e'
t i h orda r m
d s s i n fce t ol nc 'qua ii a a pr c t
r
lfes s
edi a e
of e e un rt A c ' e e e s cl us . d n l ki t t de i i ofFl r da' i e m e a y
f ns de he ts l m nt a e s oo ng o he c s ons
l
o i s nt r di r
c t beor,ghe Elvenh Cicui)hed t ta prorc ci f rssi a ofie wih
ours f e t e t r t l ha
i onviton or e itng n fc r t
vi e quaiid a avi e f ony unde t eeme sca eoft g q Caee Crmi l
olnce lfe s olnt el
r he l nt lus he Alned r r i na
Acj' Uni dSatsv Hil 7 9F.d 1 1 ,1 2 ( 1h Ci. 01 )(iig Untds ae v Ro t.
' t t e . l, 9 3 3 8 3 2 1 t r 2 5 ctn ie t ts . mo
e
Vill ,674 F. 1
laobos
3d 246,1 (11h Ci.201
251 t r 2:. Consse wih Hiland Romo- lal ,
itnt t l
vil obos
t Cour ag ee wih t r omm e ton t tt Fl i c i of รป essi a of erwih
he
t r s t he ec
nda i ha he orda rme
s itng n fc
r
t
vi e e' qua ii as a pr di t of e e unde t Ac ' elm e s clus Acc di y,t
olnc ' lfes
e cae f ns
r he ts e nt a e.
or ngl he
Cou tdenist moton t va t asJohns v UniedSt e 1 S.Ct 2551( 5)doe not
r
e he i o cae
on . t ats, 35
.
201
s
a f c t s nt i enha eme i t sc s l i f t r
fe t he e encng
nc nt n hi a e. t s urhe
ADJUDGED t tno c tfc t ofa a a lt is
ha
erii a e ppe l biiy s ue.
DON E AND ORDERED i Cha be sa M i ,Fl i t s
n
m r t mni orda, hi
FED E
ofJ y 201
ul
7.
No
UNI STXTESDI CTJ
TED
STRI UDGE
Copi f ni hed t
es ur s
o:
Unied St t M a sr e J ePa rckA . hie
t
aes gitat udg ti
W t
Couns lofRe or
e
c d
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?