Robles et al v. Acebo Roofing Corp. et al

Filing 71

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction until Friday, August 31, 2018 to enforce the terms of the settlement. Closing Case. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 9/1/2017. (mkr) NOTICE: If there are sealed documents in this case, they may be unsealed after 1 year or as directed by Court Order, unless they have been designated to be permanently sealed. See Local Rule 5.4 and Administrative Order 2014-69.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 16-21817-CIV-O’SULLIVAN
[CONSENT]
ELDER LEOPOLDO GARCIA ROBLES,
JAIRO OVIDIO GARCIA ROBLES,
FREDY OTONIEL VALLADARES LOPEZ
a/k/a ALEXANDRO BARRIOS,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ACEBO ROOFING CORP.,
PEDRO L. ACEBO,
OCTAVIO E. ACEBO,
Defendants.
_________________________/
ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND
DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE
THIS MATTER came before the Court notice from the parties that the case has
settled and the Court having conducted a hearing concerning the settlement.
THE COURT has heard from counsel and considered the terms of the
Settlement Agreement, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully
advised in the premises.
This case involves a claim for unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair
Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §201, et seq ("FLSA"). In reviewing a settlement of an
FLSA private claim, a court must "scrutiniz[e] the settlement for fairness," and
determine that the settlement is a "fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute
over FLSA provisions." Lynn Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-53
(11th Cir. 1982). A settlement entered into in an adversarial context where both sides

are represented by counsel throughout litigation "is more likely to reflect a reasonable
compromise of disputed issues." Id. The district court may approve the settlement in
order to promote the policy of encouraging settlement of litigation. Id. at 1354.
In this case, there is a bona fide factual dispute over the total number of hours
for which the plaintiffs have not been compensated. The terms of the settlement were
announced on the record in open Court. The Court has reviewed the terms of the
Settlement Agreement including the amount to be received by the plaintiffs and the
attorney’s fees and costs to be received by counsel and finds that the compromise
reached by the parties is a fair and reasonable resolution of the parties' bona fide
disputes. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties' Settlement Agreement (including
attorney’s fees and costs) is hereby APPROVED. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Court retains jurisdiction until Friday, August 31, 2018 to enforce the terms of
the settlement.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 1st day of
September, 2017.
JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies to: All counsel of record

2