Pujol v. City of Opa-Locka
Filing
27
ORDER granting 21 Motion to Compel. Amended Rule 26 disclosures due from the plaintiff by 9/11/17. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge John J. O'Sullivan on 8/30/2017. (tro) Modified signature date on 8/31/2017 (asl).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 17-21991-CIV-UNGARO/O’SULLIVAN
FRANCISCO PUJOL,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF OPA-LOCKA,
Defendant.
______________________________/
ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant, City of Opa-Locka’s,
Motion to Compel Plaintiff, Francisco Pujol, to Provide Better Rule 26 Disclosures (DE #
21, 8/9/17). Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(I) provides in pertinent part that
a party must, without awaiting a discovery request, provide
to the other parties:
(I) the name and, if known, the address and telephone
number of each individual likely to have discoverable
information--along with the subjects of that information--that
the disclosing party may use to support its claims or
defenses, unless the use would be solely for impeachment.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Accordingly, having reviewed the applicable filings and law, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Defendant, City of Opa-Locka’s, Motion to
Compel Plaintiff, Francisco Pujol, to Provide Better Rule 26 Disclosures (DE # 21,
8/9/17) is GRANTED in accordance with this Order. It is further
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that on or before September 11, 2017, the plaintiff,
Francisco Pujol, shall amend his Rule 26 disclosures to provide the contact information
of each individual listed in the disclosures (if known) and the subject of each witnesses’
expected testimony.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 30th day of August,
2017.
________________________________
JOHN J. O’SULLIVAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies provided to:
United States District Judge Ungaro
All counsel of record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?