Roland Corporation v. inMusicBrands, Inc.

Filing 350

ORDER granting 330 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Federico A. Moreno on 6/16/2021. See attached document for full details. (mmd)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case Number: 17-22405-CIV-MORENO ROLAND CORP., Plaintiff, vs. INMUSIC BRANDS, INC., Defendant. _________________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Motion for Reconsideration of the Order denying the parties’ Joint Motion to Restart Litigation and Request for Entry of Updated Scheduling Order (D.E. 330), filed on December 2, 2020. THE COURT has considered the motion, the response, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ADJUDGED that the motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. The Court reconsiders its ruling denying the joint motion to restart the litigation and finds it appropriate to reopen the case as the Magistrate Judge found there was no existing settlement agreement between the parties. The failure to consummate a settlement agreement is good cause to reopen an action. See Kennedy v. Jai Hanumaan, LLC & Rondolino v. Nw. Mut. Life Ins. Co., Case No. 18-63095CIV-Martinez (ECF No. 16) (S.D. Fla. Apr. 22, 2019) (recommending that the plaintiff’s motion to reopen case be granted where there was no enforceable settlement); Hitchock v. Orange Cty., Fla., No. 6:04-cv-1722-JA-JGG (ECF No. 46) (M.D. Fla. June 21, 2006) (granting motion to reopen after case was dismissed in light of a settlement that was not consummated); United States v. Persaud, No. 6:02-cv-1528-ACC-JGG (ECF No. 147) (M.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2005). The Court reopens this case and will issue a separate scheduling order. It is also ADJUDGED that the motion for relief from the Court’s January 6, 2020 is DENIED as moot. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this 16th of June 2021. ______________________________________ FEDERICO A. MORENO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?