Silvers v. Google, Inc.

Filing 104

REPLY MEMORANDUM, by Steven A. Silvers [98-1] motion to compel the production of documents responsive to Google Inc.'s first set of request for production to Steven A. Silvers (Former Deputy Clerk)

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 1 of 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 05-80387-CIV (Ryskamp/Vitunac )

STEVEN A . SILVERS, an individual , Plaintiff,
V. GOOGLE INC ., a Delaware corporation ,

Defendant .

GOOGLE INC ., a Delaware corporation , Counterclaimant ,
V.

STEVEN A . SILVERS, an individual ; STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC ., a Delaware corporation ; STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a business entity of unknown form ; and STEVEN ESRIG, an individual , Counter-Defendants .

DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT GOOGLE INC .'S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPE L THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM PLAINTIF F Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Steven A . Silvers' ("Silvers") Memorandum in Opposition to Google Inc .'s Motion to Compel Production (the "Opposition") mischaracterizes this Court's decisions regarding the appropriate subjects of Phase I discovery and trial . As a result, Silvers' basis for his refusal to produce admittedly voluminous communications between him and Stelor is misguided . Although Silvers claims to have produced "voluminous documents touching on his use and intent to us e

SNT/213526 .0001/N0617534 1 )

ADORNO & YOSS LL P 350 East Las Olas Boulevard · Suite 1700 · Fort Lauderdale , Florida 33301 · Telephone ( 954) 763-1200 · Facsimile [phone]

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 2 of 22

Case No . 05-80387-CIV (Ryskamp/Vitunac) the mark, his licensees, his marketing and sales of goods bearing the mark, etc .",' not one of the documents produced by Silvers is an e-mail or letter communication (aside from its agreements) between Silvers and Stelor or any of its representatives .

Silvers does not dispute the existence of these email and other communications between him and Stelor. Indeed, a recent letter from Silvers' counsel indicates that the communications between Stelor and Silvers are "volumionous" (see Exhibit A attached hereto), and other documents obtained from the prior litigation between Silvers and Stelor indicate that Silvers wrote "countless and lengthy emails . . . that INSIST Stelor enforces its legal rights and go after Google, Inc . . . ." See Ex . B attached hereto, which was introduced at the December 13, 2004, Deposition of Steven Esrig as Exhibit 9 . According to a pleading filed by Stelor in the prior Silvers/Stelor litigation, "Stelor is in possession of in excess of 100 emails and letters wherein Silvers, at a minimum, discusses litigation against Google Inc ., and in some cases all-out demands that Stelor take immediate legal action ." See Ex . C. attached hereto at p . 3, note 2. In his Opposition, Silvers contends that he need not produce communications between him and Stelor/Esrig because the only subjects to be covered during Phase I are "(1) whether Silvers abandoned his mark ; and/or (2) whether the assignment of the "Googles" trademark registration to Silvers by his company, Googles Children's Workshop, and subsequent filings with the U .S .P .T .O . served to nullify Silvers' federal registration for the mark", and any emails between Silvers and Stelor focus on their "differences of opinion about Stelor's compliance with Silvers' license and other agreements between Silvers and Stelor ." Opp'n at 2 . Additionally, Silvers contends tha t

' To date, in addition to attachments to his pleadings, Silvers has produced approximately 1,661 pages of documents .

SNT,'213526 .0001IN06175341 } ADORNC2& YOSS LL P 350 East Las Olas Boulevard · Suite 1700 · Fo rt Lauderdale , Florida 33301 · Telephone ( 954) 763-1200 · Facsimile ( 954) 766-7800

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 3 of 22

Case No . 05-80387-CIV (Ryskamp/Vitunac) Stelor's cross-claim will be addressed in Phase II and therefore such emails are not responsive . See Opp'n at 2 .

First, Silvers' reading of this Court's orders addressing Phase I is incorrect . This Court's February 6, 2006, Bifurcation Order [DE # 68] is not as narrow as Silvers suggests . Instead, the Court has ordered that the parties will first resolve the threshold issue of the extent and scope of rights, if any held by Silvers . Nowhere in the Court's Order is there a limitation to the two specific issues Silvers suggests in his Opposition . Moreover, the Court's February 27, 2006, Order expanded the scope of Phase Ito include "the contract issues raised in the Cross-Claim [which] can be efficiently resolved with the ownership issues during the first phase of this litigation ." [DE #71 at 10] . Therefore, even if it were true that the communications between Silvers and Stelor are relevant only to Stelor's cross-claims, they would be relevant to Phase I of the litigation pursuant to the Court's February 27, 2006, Order . Silvers claims that the communications between Silvers and Stelor are "none of Google's business ." Opp'n at 2 . However, Silvers cannot seriously dispute that "differences of opinion about Stelor's compliance with Silvers' license" go directly to the issue of abandonment . For example, Silvers has claimed that he was not kept apprised of or consulted regarding Stelor's alleged development of the licensed goods . In a letter dated November 12, 2004 from Silvers' counsel to Stelor's counsel, Silvers threatens Stelor with termination of the license agreement for, among other things, "[f]ailure to provide samples of all Licensed Products you intend to manufacture and sell ; and all promotional and advertising materials associated with those products . . ." See Ex . D

attached hereto . "Licensing a mark without adequate control over the quality of goods o r

;SNT/213526.000I/N0617534_1) ADORNO YOSS LL

P 350 East Las Olas Boulevard · Suite 1700 · Fort Lauderdale , Florida 33301 · Telephone [phone] · Facsimile [phone]

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 4 of 22

Case No . 05-80387 - CIV (Ryskamp/Vitunac) services sold under the mark by the licensee may cause the mark to lose its significance as a symbol of equal quality, hence , abandonment ." McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition , Vol . 3, § 17 .6, 17-9-10 ( Thomson / West 2006) .

Moreover , many of the communications between Silvers and Stelor are relev ant to Silvers' intent ( or lack thereof) to use his mark for a commercial purpose , a subject which Silvers does not dispute is relevant to Phase I . Instead , it appears that Silvers ' pri mary focus-as discussed in hundreds of emails to Stelor-was to take legal action against Google . See Exs . B and C ; see, e .g . Ex . E (3/1/04 email from Silvers to Stelor filed by Stelor as exhibit to pleading in Silvers/Stelor litigation) . Accordingly, these

communications should be produced. Lastly , Silvers fails to a rt iculate any undue burden that would be imposed upon him in producing these communications . Email communications between Silvers and

Stelor representatives are easily copied from Silvers' computer to a disk , and any letters can be copied as well . CONCLUSION Wherefore Defendant/Counterclaimant Google Inc . respectfully requests that thi s Court grant its Motion to Compel Silvers' production of communications between Silvers and Stelor representatives, together with such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper .

SNT/213526.0001 /N0617534_ I

; ADORNAYOSS LL P 350 East Las Olas Boulevard · Suite 1700 · Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 · Telephone [phone] · Facsimile [phone]

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 5 of 22

Case No . 05-80387-CIV (RyskampNitunac )

as Atlas lorida Bar No . : 226246 j itlas @.adorno .co m mantha Tesser Haim o Florida Bar No . : 0148016 stesserLwadorno .com ADORNO & YOSS LLP 350 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Phone : [phone] Fax : [phone] Johanna Calabria California Bar No . : 226222 jcalabria@perkinscoie .com PERKINS COIE LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco , California 94111 Phone : [phone] Fax : [phone] Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant Google Inc . CERTIFICATE OF SERVIC E I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been furnished by email and mail on the addressee(s~1listed on\the attached schedule on thi s day of July, 2006 .

{SNT.'213526 .0001/N0617534_I } ADORN(f& YOSS LL

P 350 East Las Olas Boulevard · Suite 1700 · Fo rt Lauderdale , Florida 33301 · Telephone ( 954) 763-1200 · Facsimile ( 954) 766-7800

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 6 of 22

Case No . 05-80387-CIV ( Ryskamp/Vitunac )

SERVICE LIS T Harley S . Tropin, Esq . hst(i?kttlaw .coin Kenneth R. Hartmann, Esq . krh(u%kttlaw .com Gail A. McQuilkin, Esq. gam ctkttlaw .co m
KOZYAK, TROPIN , THROCKMORTON, P .A .

Steven A . Silvers 8983 Okeechobee Blvd . Suite 202 - PMB 203 West Palm Beach, Florida 3341 1 Email : eg [e-mail] Telephone : [phone] Facsimile : (561) 784-995 9 Ramsey M . Al-Salam, Esq . Washington Bar . No. 1882 2 ralsalam @perkinscoie .co m William C . Rava, Esq . Washington Bar No . 2994 8 wrava ,perkinscoie .co m PERKINS COIE LL P 1201 Third Avenue Suite 480 0 Seattle , WA 98101-309 9 Telephone : [phone] Facsimile : - (206) 359-733 8

2525 Ponce de Leon, 9th Floor Miami , FL 3313 4 Telephone : [phone] Facsimile : (305) 372-350 8 Adam T . Rabin, Esq. arabin@dkrpa .com DIMOND, KAPLAN & ROTHSTEIN, P.A . 525 South Flagler Drive Trump Plaza, Suite 200 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone : [phone] Facsimile : [phone] Kevin C. Kaplan, Esq. kkaplan u%hwskb .com BURLINGTON, WEIL, SCHWIEP, KAPLAN & BLONSKY, P .A. 2699 South Bayshore Drive Miami, FL 3313 3 Telephone : [phone] Facsimile : (305) 858-526 1

(SNT/213526 .0001/N06175 .141 k

ADORNA YOSS LL P 350 East Las Olas Boulevard · Suite 1700 · Fo rt Lauderdale , Florida 33301 · Telephone ( 954) 763-1200 · Facsimile [phone]

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 7 of 22

EXHIBIT A

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 8 of 22

LAW OFFICE S

KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON, P .A .
2525 PONCE DE LEON · 9TH FLOOR CORAL GABLES , F LORIDA 33134-603 7 KENNETH R . HARTMANN DIRECT DIAL (305 ) 377-0657 TELEPHONE ( 305) 372-1800 TELECOPIER ( 305) 372-3508

June 30, 200 6

Johanna Calabria, Esq . Perkins Coie, LLP
180 Townsend Street 3rd Floor

S an Francisco , CA 94107
Re : Silvers/Google, Inc. - Discovery

Dear Johanna : As we discussed on Thursday, June 29, 2006, Mr. Silvers is amenable to producing documents relating to his license with Aurora, including communications and development of Silvers' IF .
As to Stelor, we have some materials relating to Stelor's use of the mark, and can provide those . The "communications" between Stelor and Silvers, however, are voluminous . Can you specify the subjects you believe are within the Phase One discovery, so that Silvers can determine what is responsive?

Very truly yours,

Kenneth R. Hartman n K.RI-Ulmm cc : Gail McQuilkin, Esq . Steve Silvers
3339/102/266791 .1

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 9 of 22

EXHIBIT B

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 10 of 22

Good Vibrations International Inc .
. PORT ST. G.HARLES, SUITE 329, .ST . PETER, BARBADOS, WEST INDIE S

Ne·pInKnKE N Ind a ds l OIs1AbUW(

Tel/Fax : [phone]

E-mail : goodvIbes (MpIllars .com www 6nillars . com/goodvlba s

Steve,

It has-come to my .attention that we are having more trouble with Mr. Silvers . As you know, I have $600,000 invested in Stelor (tire largest investor), not the least of which are many hours of my personal time, and even though I am now on the board of directors, I am extremely worried . This is beginning to seriously endanger mine and your future :
After the meeting in New York (June) with Silvers and his lawyers (Stumpf), and regardless of what you told me, I knew that this matter wasn't over . Now you are confirming my worst fear, by telling me that Silvers is destroying Stelor 's ability to bring in the much needed capital - you know we require , in order to bring googles.com to market. I was certain that after the board instructed you to file the law suit against Silvers, this action would legally protect my investment. However, now Silver's attorn ey has successfully defeated the emergency nature of our suit and has, fu rthermore , set about negotiating with Google, Inc .! I .have seen countless and lengthy emails from Steven A, Silvers personally, that INSIST Stelor enforces its legal rights and go after Google, Inc .; DEMANDING we file suit! And, now you,tell me that Silver ' s lawyer ( expecting a piece of the se ttlement ) -has submi tted a document stating that "Mr . Steven Silvers does not dispute Google, Inc.'s right to its domain name . . ." How convenient ! Steve! What the hell is going on ? Are you on top of this? Is there a chance that 1 have been wrong about you and that you don't know what you're doing? I am seriously considering action against you personally. I hope .I am making myself very clear . Do something about this! Protect our investment! Protect our company from this despicable, conniving and crazed person . . . I would hate to thirik of the consequences that would surely follow! Regrettably yours ,

Michael A . DiMucci o
c .c . Paul Haw a P .S . I am emailing this to you for urgency sake, however, a registered original is following by nail - take it seriously.

I

D La ~a- p'- o y

EXHIBIT

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 11 of 22

EXHIBIT C

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 12 of 22

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORID A

STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC ., CASE NO . 04-80954-CIV-HURLEY (a Delaware Corporation) Magistrate : Judge James M . Hopkin s Plaintiff
v.

STEVEN A . SILVERS ,
( a resident of Palm Beach County, Flo ri da) . Defendant .

PLAINTIFF ' S REPLY TO SILVERS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO STELOR' S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 1. INTRODUCTIO N

Plaintiff, Stelor Productions, Inc . ("Stelor"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby replies to Defendant's, Steven A . Silvers' ("Silvers"), Memorandum in Opposition to Stelor's Motion for Preliminary Injunction : Stelor merely seeks to conduct its business free from interference by Silvers . That is exactly what Silvers licensed Stelor to do, pursuant to the License, Distribution and Manufacturing Agreement ("License Agreement") entered into by the parties in 2002 . Contrary to Defendant's assertions, an order granting Stelor's request for an injunction is needed to protect Stelor's rights under that License Agreement, by prohibiting Silvers from interfering with the foundation of Stelor's business, the Licensed "GOGGLES" Intellectual Property . As the evidence demonstrates, Stelor has been, and in the absence of injunctive relief will continue to be, irreparably harmed .

U . BRIEF STATEMENT OF FACT S
Notwithstanding Defendant's overstatement of his role in bringing the Googles from Goo to market, the fact remains that Stelor is truly responsible for the progress Mr . Silvers' original concept has made over the past two years . Silvers lacked the resources, drive, and credibility to turn the concept into a commercially successful reality . One of the key reasons Defendant was unable to commercialize his property on his own was his felony conviction for cocaine

M j~

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 13 of 22

some time , and perhaps even more revealing is that the " et . al ." referred to in the amendment is Steven A . Esrig and the soon to be formed Stelor Productions, Inc . Also indicative of Silvers ' desire to engage in legal actions against Google Inc . relative to his trademark registration are the countless emails an d letters sent by him to Stelor before, du ri ng , and after Stelor' s inception .2 In those emails Defendant prods Stelor to "sue these

bastards now " (July 27, 2003) and "bring them [ Google Inc .) down or better yet put the fear of God in them" only after railing against Google ' s founders stating " I hate looking at the cover of Time Mag with those two yuppies gloating like the[y] are" (April 15, 2004) . See Exhibit " ," B

two emails from Silvers to Steve Esri g , CEO of Stelor Productions, Inc . (Due to their length, the relevant po rtion of each email has been highlighted for the cou rt.) It was clear to Stelor that

Silvers not only foresaw , but eagerly anticipated, litigation with Google Inc . As a result, the License Agreement requires that Silvers "cooperat [e] in every way necessary and desirable to strengthen , establish or maintain the "Googles" intellectual prope rt y and related assets ." See License Agreement , Article VIII(E) . This provision directly relates to anticipated litigation between Stelor and Google Inc, or any other infri nger, and requires Silvers to cooperate with Stelor . Defendant ' s emails indicate he has always , until recently, been willing to cooperate with any dispute with Google , Inc . Silvers' conduct to date, relative to the disputes with Google Inc ., has been anything but desirable and in fact has prejudiced Stelor ' s ability to protect the GOOGLES IP .

III. THE PROPER STANDARD FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Stelor requests injunctive relief in order to maintain the status quo during the pendency of this action . To this end, Stelor requests that Silvers be ordered to cease interfering with the actions now pending in the USPTO and the NAF . Silvers' attempt to characterize the injunction as seeking mandatory relief is inaccurate . Stelor asks the court to prohibit Silvers from taking action, and not to force Silvers to take any affirmative actions . Motion for Preliminary Injunction, pp . 2-3 . Although Clause "E" of Plaintiff's motion does request that the court order Silvers to immediately and fully cooperate with Stelor, Silvers' opposition acknowledges his obligatio n 2 Stelor is in possession of in excess of 100 emails and letters wherein Silvers, at a minimum, discusses litigation against Google Inc ., and in some cases all-out demands that Stelor take immediate legal action . See Plaintiffs Emergency

3

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 14 of 22

EXHIBIT D

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 15 of 22

LAW OFFICE S

KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMOF2TON, P .A .
2929 PONCE DE LEON · 9TH FLOOR CORAL GABLES, F LORIDA 33134-6D37 TELEPHONE [phone]-IBOO TELECOPIER (305) 372-33O e

Vi -,j Federal Lxpress AWB#7927-7747-7745 November 12, 2004 Steven A. Esrig
Stelor Productions, Inc . 14701 Mockingbird Drive Damestown, Maryland 2087 4

Re: Silvers/Stelor License Agreemen t 'DeaiMi. Ecrig.
We represent Steven Silvers, Licensor under that License, Distribution and Manufacturing Agreement dated June 1, 2002 ("Agreement") . Pursuant to paragraph ]X-A of the Agreement, this rcise his right serves asnotice that Stelor has breached the Agreement and that Mr . Skivers will exe to terminate the Agreement unless Stelor cures the following breaches within 60 days :

EL. Failure to pay royalties under paragraph III (A) ;
b . Failure to provide a written certified royalty statement under paragraph III (C) c. Failure to provide a list of all sub licenses under paragraph III (C) ; ;.

d. Failure to use oommercially reasonable efforts to promote, market, sell and distribute the Licensed Products under paragraph V (B)(sii) ; e . Failure to accommodate Licensor's request to audit the books and records of Stelor made under paragraph IV (A) and (C); and f. Failure to provide samples of all Licensed Products you intend to manufacture sell; and all promotional and advertising mate rials associated with those products under paragraph VI (C);
g . Failure to include appropriate legal notices with the Licensed Products under paragraph VI(A) ; h. - Failure to maintain the requisite level of quality for the Licensed Products under paragraph VI (B) ;

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 16 of 22

Page 2 i . Failure to maintainLicensor' s IntellectualPropertyBights, namelyfadureto maintain the domain names googlegame . com, googlesgames . com, and googlegame. com, under paragr aph VIII; j . FailuretoregisterLicensor' sIntellectualPropertyRightsinthenameofLicensor, and instead registering copyrights and trademarks in Stelor's name ; k. Failureto oppose trademark applications for the name Googles, and the domainname registration googles . org, and otherwise protect the Licensed Intellectual Property; an d L Unlawful use of the limited power of attorney granted under the.Agreement, namely retaining counsel for Mr . Silvers without his knowledge or consent', filing an action in the name of Mr: Silvers to dispute Google, Inc .'s right to use the domainname google . com, and filing an answer in the name of Mr. Silvers in Cancellation Proceeding 92043737 . This also serves as no tice under the Letter Agreement dated June 1 , 2002, that Stelor has breached the Letter Agreement by its : a. Failure to pay Mr . Silvers consultancy fees and expenses; b . Failure to provide Mr. Silvers with an agreement granting him stock options for 1,000 shares of Stator's story . c . Malring unauthorized statements and representations on behalf of Mr. Silvers; and d. .Attempting to transfer, release and waive Mr. Silvers right, title, and interest in his intellectual property.
Pursuant to paragraph 1 of the Lett er Agreement, Mr . Silvers will exercise his right to terminate theLicense, Distribution and Manufacturing Agreement unless Stelor cures these breaches within 3 0 days .

Gail A McQuiikin c: Steven A. Silvers Laurence Hefter
J745as1

.

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 17 of 22

EXHIBI T E

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 18 of 22

Stelor Produc ti as, Inc. Attu : Steve Es g, President/CE0 & Ste or Boald of Directors 14701 Mocking Ird Drive Darnestown, M~ ryland 20874 March 1, 2004 Re: Formal Dear Steve : J. otice & Request For A on &' Vritten Dispositi ons i ou that 'I would not be a responsibl e e, the issues you are about to r ea d. ank you !
or, In accordance with odr existing

that have yet to be resolved.so m y es on the issues that I'm about to laced in writing to you via an e-mail
'ebruary 25, 2004 , 1 had explaine d

I know that y o formally add r that was add therein that I believe are at adversarial wa

and I have spoken s

era]

however, as I have r tly sed to Julie on Wedn day, ould be. sending Stelor a fo in need . of resolving th a ner.

al notice outlining the issues that I we may move forward in a non-

IRRELEVANT MATERIAL REDACTED

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 19 of 22

6). 4 Is'Pl ' th
Q1Gfsw kia

w t i?t°~f' Cf ':7 Jr if~~'x`~ ,

i :+a it 4~'uYl~fi D~'''"lYt ='con 'Itla' : £

sueF of:~t}~g::pepa "'. !-J.tu oo.ndbgYthtta..0-apt !

e#g1~A~ ,1 ~il !~r ~pi~d~iliirteatfaliX~ i str+titsall . :~vxtttaicif aL >i~~i~U ~_.::
IIdjII 'I~ii~aY4w'beanlftD r .~u...,u.. .,.
.!; .s

: nrasr fti· ~~rq+cats r.~ra~ ·o ~s3

Psi AE:_9911

Rip

. {ren+ - u1 :~ aibv`I ffe xCr` tv~bf +·exilr tie t" . .,. .: - ` K r' :. . ar feQ th e d ;~ U·· canaea -of .actlowna -and '~ti"' `",,,~;srJ!is4tf1~ y ·~

attoifi ce .-the chuiv rfg . . !y
n· 1ii .otwaou Yo W

.. ,aama~to-i a j
. AF: ga :1 .8 Ou

b!K l-

:

..

.br_ a. atne.. _ . .

O t t ! O Y b1 In a s. x ~ ' .. jC' a ss des: ' x K b ~ ~i+hl +_s ur , _W - .JIM F

°1tiY[' ais7t 7tr iurlr you hart.- the right lo,~ fi._~tP.,: . . tmt' ~ m l15a7sit8r .~giait brunt is my ~etwait. t_ 1 can g narthE ' .er,~pt .ik ::xad _a .·.tht ~IiT . mrn~~o4i >~ta y. of · r . , etliewent from or lnfril~ 't w 7cb' war moot lli~el"y, ip T;}i_v i· :. It;+ ;,~a~b) we w W o· r6 . ng or an ' e hiveto, as ,,,. . w · :see-r o egpftabl , a~ ea tA iri~bB t of any ~a ~f . nom t1SllIp ·,wi(Eti;'eei :.d~; . otht wI1e. hou1'd- -'-, t, V ·:,~. ;:,~ :~'ioop~~ " , . , , ~ ~ ~+nttr ., In a
R .r :. Y

favor bfi b e·fo i3e ar the Li cenalu ~i[un afiy,Jiti~tion a t' t"it r+a 4 _ eitt y: . and falt~ v icb a t -now vino iela "~ y !t~ePer r, o ~ `e oftf ^t~y~ ~ a a ile-aifi Wafe as t ag-pursu ne me UU 1JU05 tnd 4 our d > t` 44 .. , . . :.F, dql y 1 rC17 T~ :oct?F' in'ANZA rt g bprp,,, ; offender that,, hprtib on jq .}~ipur alien ioa=eocb =i[ GojWkeoaa ·

rm fon, .~j: cYoea~by°ibei`~'fviifbe oibten w'il seed to :go .t r."Hnw , , you 0 ode ft nali dear to idol at at this time Stelor .A not ia .apy o Sawa to i~~ aft==afQ!y rd(' lbee ~: tifriagera,...Vi p tat 'ot poaitioo t' Googk.cou a cia "hip: thb-could potentIally ·cw sre: .pnaid n;·in .thu a a.. the Licenwr~ matt .~ can certaini . a fir equ; bon. ta, g, .tnmaintain a sense `of b Iance%bet~,rtqu _ .. 1lam i), i iq{ .all hoceeiia ba ~e ieen _fit to your aee8 iii 4 ° · . : . dtattAad'by°a ' wbetber`+o~r~u'`t fe 'i' Y`goh g a t~ '}go ei : oat ;,t n i i,, _ a m ,ayt~' if~ , --f~ tiff:~~~info rural ,x7nu N4S` '~ >a . both 5 vex~b1%

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 20 of 22

s eniie" "'' that' are lifce3y~te-l by the +'~T'b ` :mnore..lime at·goea .bjLtheYw.e~lrer:, ~ m~8'to=th~ i gard:`~ It 'dl be ate;4ry 'dnt' Wrd mt to ~ and .43t ou p
M~:~i~C:%it

4

~~o. s .is:iaa ::betteI fiU vl de1n . .I: told thpkyotif toun
that.T'"[ t
pertains to. t · e

.pa~allttOfl tali#igsitttsttietvmpttliy '~o IY tb

Ye . .lost .iheappaal ado; a... 'UM eaaonable

u·tbat Litroneiv' diest lree"~ritl'the·'a'av ''~rou ·aivi lormeo _m e a

,gEyen ~~oi+ ~;~ar,~~~"the fiTin~,of=a fi1FIIRU/IlDR~.:procceding, , ... , e.conr_gNjnt' ;pd tbe~. cr' L9iii(tZ2 :Irt~!'!!t `.t)ogte! z* ;x ::: ' ;

uiui:tl a a a u e _ o I '. ." c o

S O M In lbe` inailkftvolscc. :%Ab.gpt . the fact ` #itfllti ement -essr' against .

. .c1561r; we:could=trtFlte ' ire"bated `itpoh'confustaxIWO* :11ly.· aP,
te rnet, . J ve:urg aINy es naee aedieatce " with Go le ·a~ce':"c' ivei `io that a. em · o o r pion and we cotdd peep l al'6 are' adou beii .· Len ' e''~t vt'a .mncfeft ndderitapdiogas to :b4. ,we,slro d -'procee aytinstst}f' - ti' ,pv, s.+cogl~clfir : ¢;t; lntereit'' from .. MicroS o~tand i .z $' rs it I=. licx ·.tLis- ay.,¢~{t sound i 1 ; ~,a1sb 'believe' -~ Mtlctt jfe" ' A b dit tlj Yaibt1boi 'a.·moath : -ad 4n, avdiea` NOW ~VJth : _Google:' 'abd':''iet lamp*e~. rion=receptive tb "'iaa ,, e?. ` iri~anting to ea deal . r l~`doubt iitl'iotiely. · if>Mlcro oft or 4w . °-7 " Yobdo._~riH. acR e{ is cutttn U de%[;' rdtN-"70-tbeir ,into at levels. its ttie 'Butt . - A roc to e.com NOS' =;li'e ~~ n a I~see for crr~tora once and fora tiEh ei='tb r{Y top y o wew_. ioek redreaa tiefore the feditji cbi -i:· i>e, , ·fA, iDt :.· . . ~P °t9 :q !t:; K' o e . t p er. an :t n 1s1,1: . 4~' · '-· 'tA :or.. b So t eJc=' Sd~ ~ ro n3lii Att' :·,Ai . ti:noar< axan oo a eeebdiagly in pus rei! ibeir· O`_ireleaie~fo ':i in ,:iii ep3embec ..ii4 .w $i i t+tiir , aft~.y~iy : a pros w _ spe cs tivW!-_ e a ow or, ;ua a t·A D months a ay~ :· amsivr~e~'~j~'re4uestin `x`die bYitioQ l:tp.' wb f e~;al~. .aot Stelor is bb t ie .' Go, 1r oip .'ear en a xIM4 the preps re4r , to I ft, I P·Ittidfor Gnn_ples b t` be Very"':1ea . iot'iie"r~ i lei s _Mn a·,ne][ t:L3Q,}·thirty-days fro m ~osaIt r the relki T'~ ts'aettcr or give tne,,in , A_lor' a pad j,4p at 30 'hy b y are L-m .

.rei

t.prepirrea _ tisrti a1uget co

o!'sCtioa you .are . pltrnnln' B Ito-~ira_ ou to .

;Go :4iradcm i an 16 ·'·iatcile ual .-propcrty riebta on properl b~lu~f ~d=~L1ie L censor?_ . Just - so= your ~b *-T M-ta p ~seil tta god thll.;~lane If .
~^J~~~

____p r~ttect n~'y~'Go
y"

can1identtbnt .c`p = ropeRy prepare and e~bsuently file a me O I1Y`'tbdetal" eq ;th _ of tbae 11rip ers and. then bo ,t. start':tlie ;'>ie]1, rig1Wa~ ~~puy . l eek Sompetenl ibuiiaeel'td ' t'ther tampion :tfi `cause to._seeti'redrei s sor, p"oslHoaI~kciiuld.n n ort' e·con i: s:a reapoii ifile therisk.-.1 M 0 if: AY-::OPpO.unity·;ta~;'bt ,pi !l;~c uab"o!. action fti A.'timeiy fai oil'' o .j P n e e i ~ m a t t e r s - s i , tj' lg3o be a -been- Oi huig~1'`-e '. time n ow1 dlse7tnorr-flat doing so,

x-

in that no tburt ut .tb.;. land wowe'ruJc -

otberxise,.No t h t t v i a g' p r ~ p e :f i f i d f f ig VHM) Stelorlbii hnt' and my position: W W :r
n-Sle~@r b :~~ .~= fFr fe A itf-0 s

: .,,

bu to 3i_IWF a ii1 :Bnt:

nw.

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 21 of 22

s-

from:!uti:oryo r. nunsel;.fcrritptb~trgepAib~ :ti~!e~r~m~<8! Ord fbi 6 abd ?

~r n .~e ~ =Aq ,,olY. KtLe: lr~o dndi ~~fcwtnn . pD°4~ar3~ : .-d}t~s~lori Pem#a~:s

'

.

IRRELEVANT MATERIAL REDACTED

Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR

Document 104

Entered on FLSD Docket 07/28/2006

Page 22 of 22

IRRELEVANT MATERIAL REDACTE D

Res*-tfnily submi tt ed by,

P.S. I'm Ili]] WI ting to speak with Henry, as you indicated to me we would speak via a eon fe rea call on two separate occasions last week. What happened ? P .S.S. Thanks for sending my December 2003 Consulting Fee Check, I received It on February 27, 2004 along with my 1099 for year ending December 2003 . SI NT VIA FEDEX ON March 1, 2004 USING AIRBILL TRACKING NUMBER : 842190092158