Silvers v. Google, Inc.

Filing 59

ORDER granting [56-1] motion to extend time to respond to Silvers' motion todismiss amended crossclaim ( Signed by Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp on 12/27/05) [EOD Date: 1/5/06] (rb, Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORID A CASE NO . 05-80387 CIV RYSKAMP /VITUNIC STEVEN A . SILVERS, an individual , Plaintiff, V. GOOGLE INC ., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. / GOOGLE INC ., a Delaware corporatio n DEC 2 7 2005 CLARENCE MADDOX CLERK U .S . DIST . CT. S .D . OF FLA . . W.P . B Counterclaimant, V. STEVEN A . SILVERS, an individual ; STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC ., a Delaware Corporation ; STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liabili ty company , Counterdefendants . ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO SILVERS' MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED CROSSCLAI M This matter came before the Court on Counterdefendants , STELOR PRODUCTIONS, L .L .C ., f/k/a STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC . ("Ste lor") and STEVEN ESRIG ("Esrig") (collectively , " Stelor Defendants "), Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Silvers' Motion to Dismiss Amended Crossclaim . fully advised in the premises , it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows : Having reviewed the Motion , and being otherwise Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 59 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/05/2006 Page 2 of 2 Case No . 05-80387 CIV RYSKAMPNITUNI C 1 . The Motion is hereby GRANTED . 2 . The Stelor Defendants shall have up to and including December 23, 2005 to se rv e their response to Silvers Motion to Dismiss Amended Crossclaim . DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach , Fbri da , this, day o f December, 2005 . cc : Jan Dougl as Atlas, Esq . Andrew P . B ri dges, Esq. Kenneth R. Hartmann, Esq . Kevin C . Kaplan, Esq . Adam T. Rabin, Esq. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?