Silvers v. Google, Inc.

Filing 66

RESPONSE by Stelor Productions in opposition to [65-1] motion to requrire Stelor to comply with rule 5 (Former Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
Silvers v. Google, Inc. Doc. 66 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 1 of 14 Jan 30 2006 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 05-80387 CIV RYSKAMP/VITUNIC STEVEN A. SILVERS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. _______________________________________/ GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation Counterclaimant, v. STEVEN A. SILVERS, an individual; STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Counterdefendants. ________________________________________/ STELOR'S OPPOSITION TO SILVERS' MOTION TO REQUIRE STELOR TO COMPLY WITH RULE 5 Counterdefendant/Crossplaintiff, STELOR PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C., f/k/a STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. ("Stelor"), by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby opposes on the following grounds Steven A. Silvers ("Silvers") Motion to Require Stelor to Comply with Rule 5: Stelor has complied and will continue to comply with Rule 5. All papers Stelor has filed with the Court in this action have properly been served as well. The claims of Silver's counsel are entirely without substantiation, and in fact wrong. A true and correct copy of the email 1 of 14 Dockets.Just66pa ia.com Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 2 of 14 Case No. 05-80387 CIV RYSKAMP/VITUNIC transmission from David Zack, Esq. to all counsel in this action enclosing Stelor's NonOpposition to Steven Silvers' Motion for Enlargement, is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". Clearly that paper was served by email and by mail, as the certificate reflects. A true and correct copy of that email, received by Mr. Kaplan, Esq., is also attached as Exhibit "B". To the extent Silvers' counsel is having issues receiving their mail, Stelor has no way of knowing whether the issue exists at their offices, whether they simply misplaced (or misdocketed) documents, or if in fact, papers were lost in the mail. Nor should Stelor (or this Court) be required to waste further resources on this issue. Stelor has served and will continue to serve all papers as required by Rule 5. Stelor has no objection if this Court wants to enter an order requiring ALL PARTIES also to serve papers electronically. No justification whatsoever exists for requiring Stelor, specifically, to follow certain procedures, and Stelor objects to entry of any such order. For these reasons, Silvers' Motion is unfounded and should be denied. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, BURLINGTON, WEIL, SCHWIEP, KAPLAN & BLONSKY, P.A. Attorneys for Stelor Productions, LLC 2699 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse Miami, Florida 33133 Tel: 305-858-2900 Fax: 305-858-5261 Email: kkaplan@bwskb.com djzack@bwskb.com By: /s/ Kevin C. Kaplan /s/ David J. Zack Kevin C. Kaplan Florida Bar No. 933848 David J. Zack Florida Bar No. 641685 2 2 of 14 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 3 of 14 Case No. 05-80387 CIV RYSKAMP/VITUNIC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was served electronically and via U.S. mail on this 30th day of January, 2006 upon the following: Adam T. Rabin, Esq. DIMOND, KAPLAN & ROTHSTEIN, P.A. Trump Plaza 525 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 200 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 arabin@dkrpa.com Jan Douglas Atlas ADORNO & YOSS LLP 350 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1700 Fort Lauderdale, Flroida 33301 jatlas@adorno.com Kenneth R. Hartmann, Esq. Gail M. McQuilkin, Esq. KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON, P.A. 2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd., 9th Floor Coral Gables, Florida 33134 gam@kttlaw.com Andrew P. Bridges WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, Suite 3900 San Francisco, California 94111 abridges@winston.com /s/ Kevin C. Kaplan Kevin C. Kaplan 3 3 of 14 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 4 of 14 4 of 14 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 5 of 14 5 of 14 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 6 of 14 6 of 14 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 7 of 14 7 of 14 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 8 of 14 8 of 14 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 9 of 14 9 of 14 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 10 of 14 10 of 14 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 11 of 14 11 of 14 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 12 of 14 12 of 14 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 13 of 14 13 of 14 Message Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/31/2006 Page 1 of 1 Page 14 of 14 Kevin C. Kaplan From: Sent: To: Cc: David Zack Friday, January 06, 2006 4:41 PM 'arabin@dkrpa.com'; 'GAM@kttlaw.com'; 'jatlas@adorna.com'; 'abridges@winston.com' Kevin C. Kaplan; Lola Maclaren Attachments: Stelor Productions, LLC's Non-Opposition to Steven Silvers' Motion for Enlargement of Time.pdf Please see the attached. 14 of 14 1/30/2006

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?