Silvers v. Google, Inc.

Filing 79

MOTION by Stelor Productions,L to extend time to respond to Google Inc.'s first set of document requests (Former Deputy Clerk)

Download PDF
Silvers v. Google, Inc. Doc. 79 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2006 Page 1 of 5 May 8 2006 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 05-80387 CIV RYSKAMP/VITUNIC STEVEN A. SILVERS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. _______________________________________/ GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation Counterclaimant, v. STEVEN A. SILVERS, an individual; STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Counterdefendants. ________________________________________/ STELOR LLC'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT TO RESPOND TO GOOGLE INC.'S FIRST SET OF DOCUMENT REQUESTS Counterdefendant, STELOR PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C., f/k/a STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. ("Stelor"), by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby files this Motion for Enlargement of Time to respond to Google Inc's First Set of Document Requests: 1. Google sought and obtained an order bifurcating discovery and trial in this action, which limits the first phase of the case to the "threshold issue of ownership" of the trademarks at issue. Nevertheless, Google has served a voluminous request for production of documents from BURLI N GTO N SC H WI EP KAP LAN & BLO N SK Y, P A. . O F FI C E 1 of 5 IN TH E G R O VE P E N T H O US E E MAI L: 26 99 S O UT H B AYSH O R E D R I VE M I AMI , F LO R I DA 3 3 I 3 3 WWW BSKBLA . CO M . W T: 305.858.2900 F: 305.8 58 .526 I I N FO @ BSKBLA . CO M W Dockets.Just79pa ia.com Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2006 Page 2 of 5 Stelor, seeking in excess of 100 categories of documents, the majority of which appear to have no conceivable connection to that limited threshold issue (the exclusive subject of the first phase of the case). 2. Stelor is attempting to ferret through the items of the request and determine which Stelor recognizes the pending discovery categories in fact relate to the threshold issue. deadlines, and is committed to responding as promptly as possible. 3. Given the nature of the requests, however, Stelor has not yet been able to complete the process. 4. Accordingly, Stelor requests a 20-day enlargement of time to respond to the request for production. 5. Stelor has advised counsel for Google of the requested enlargement, as well as the issues regarding the request's scope, but Counsel for Google has refused to agree to the request. WHEREFORE, Stelor respectfully requests entry of an order enlarging by ten days, up to and including May 29, 2006, the time for Stelor to respond Google Inc.'s First Request for Production to Stelor. BURLINGTON, SCHWIEP, KAPLAN & BLONSKY, P.A. Attorneys for Stelor Productions, LLC 2699 South Bayshore Drive, Penthouse Miami, Florida 33133 Tel: 305-858-2900 Fax: 305-858-5261 Email: kkaplan@bwskb.com By: /s/ Kevin C. Kaplan Kevin C. Kaplan Florida Bar No. 933848 David J. Zack Florida Bar No. 641685 2 BURLI N GTO N SC H WI EP KAP LAN & BLO N SK Y, P A. . O F FI C E 2 of 5 IN TH E G R O VE P E N T H O US E E MAI L: 26 99 S O UT H B AYSH O R E D R I VE M I AMI , F LO R I DA 3 3 I 3 3 WWW BSKBLA . CO M . W T: 305.858.2900 F: 305.8 58 .526 I I N FO @ BSKBLA . CO M W Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2006 Page 3 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was served via U.S. mail on this 8th day of May, 2006 upon the following: Adam T. Rabin, Esq. DIMOND, KAPLAN & ROTHSTEIN, P.A. Trump Plaza 525 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 200 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Jan Douglas Atlas ADORNO & YOSS LLP 350 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1700 Fort Lauderdale, Flroida 33301 Kenneth R. Hartmann, Esq. Gail M. McQuilkin, Esq. KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON, P.A. 2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd., 9th Floor Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Andrew P. Bridges WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, Suite 3900 San Francisco, California 94111 /s/ Kevin C. Kaplan Kevin C. Kaplan 3 BURLI N GTO N SC H WI EP KAP LAN & BLO N SK Y, P A. . O F FI C E 3 of 5 IN TH E G R O VE P E N T H O US E E MAI L: 26 99 S O UT H B AYSH O R E D R I VE M I AMI , F LO R I DA 3 3 I 3 3 WWW BSKBLA . CO M . W T: 305.858.2900 F: 305.8 58 .526 I I N FO @ BSKBLA . CO M W Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2006 Page 4 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 05-80387 CIV RYSKAMP/VITUNIC STEVEN A. SILVERS, an individual, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. _______________________________________/ GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation Counterclaimant, v. STEVEN A. SILVERS, an individual; STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Delaware Corporation; STELOR PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Counterdefendants. ________________________________________/ PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING STELOR LLC'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT TO RESPOND TO GOOGLE INC.'S FIRST SET OF DOCUMENT REQUESTS This matter came before the Court on Counterdefendants, STELOR PRODUCTIONS, L.L.C., f/k/a STELOR PRODUCTIONS, INC. ("Stelor"), Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Google Inc.'s First Set of Document Requests, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Motion is hereby GRANTED. 4 of 5 Case 9:05-cv-80387-KLR Document 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2006 Page 5 of 5 Case No. 05-80387 CIV RYSKAMP/VITUNIC 2. Stelor shall have up to and including May 28, 2006 to respond to Google Inc.'s First Set of Document Requests. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida, this ____ day of May, 2006. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE cc: Jan Douglas Atlas, Esq. Andrew P. Bridges, Esq. Kenneth R. Hartmann, Esq. Kevin C. Kaplan, Esq. Adam T. Rabin, Esq. 2 5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?