Stelor Productions, v. Silvers

Filing 91

MANDATE OF USCA (certified copy)remanding to the district court with instructions to vacate the order denying appellant's motion for injuctive relief and to dismiss the action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction [65-1] appeal Mandate Issued Date: 11/15/05; USCA Appeal #: 05-14258-II; Copy to Judge. (ga, Deputy Clerk)

Case 9:05-cv-80393-DTKH

Document 91

Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2005

Page 1 of 3

United States Court of Appeals
Eleventh Circui t
56 Forsyth Street . N .W . Atlanta, Georgia 3030 3 i homas K . Kahn Clerk For rules and forms visit www . c a l 1 . uscourts . go v

November 15, 2005 Clarence Maddo x Clerk, U .S . District Court 301 N MIAMI AVE STE 150 MIAMI FL 33128-778 8 Appeal Number : 05-14258-1 1 Case Style : Stelor Productions v . Steven A . Silvers District Court Number : 05-80393 CV-DTKH

The enclosed certified copy of this Court's order of remand is issued as the mandate of this Court . Counsel and parties are advised that with this order of remand this appea l is concluded . If further review is to be sought in the future a timely new notice of appeal must be filed . The district court clerk is requested to acknowledge receipt on the copy of this letter enclosed to the clerk . Sincerely, THOMAS K . KAHN, Cler k Reply To : Tonya Dumas (404) 335-617 8

Encl .

DIS-4 (3-2005)

Case 9:05-cv-80393-DTKH

Document 91

Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2005

Page 2 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL S FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

D U .S . C8l1RFTLOF APPEAL S IE
ELEVENTH CIRCUI T
No . 05-14258-I I

STELOR PRODUCTIONS, L .L .C ., a Delaware corporation , f.k .a . Stelor Productions, Inc ., Plaintiff-Appellant, versu s STEVEN A . SILVERS, a Florida resident, Defendant-Appellee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

T

.:y

Atiti't &

Before DUBINA, HULL, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges . BY THE COURT :

6~~1taerk Atlanta , Georgia

The district cou rt lacked subject-matter juri sdiction to deny Appell ant ' s motion for injunctive relief. See 28 U . S .C . § 1332 . This case is REMANDED with inst ru ctions to vacate that order and to dismiss the action for lack of subject-matt er juri sdiction . See United States v . Corrick , 298 U .S . 435, 440, 56 S .Ct . 829, 832 , 80 L.Ed. 1263 (1936) ; Bender v . Williamsport Area Sch . Dist . , 475 U .S . 534, 541, 106 S .Ct . 1326, 1331, 89 L.Ed.2d 501 ( 1986) ; Tamiami Part ners, Ltd . ex rel . Tamiami Dev . Corp . V. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Fla . , 177 F .3d 1212, 1221 ( 11th Cir . 1999) ; Green v.

Case 9:05-cv-80393-DTKH

Document 91

Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2005

Page 3 of 3

Brantley, 981 F.2d 514, 521 (11th Cir . 1993) . Appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED as moot .

2