Federal Trade Commission v. Sterling Precious Metals, LLC et al

Filing 85

ORDER granting 84 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically. Plaintiff's counsel shall contact the Courtroom Deputy at least 24 hours before the hearing to make appropriate arrangements. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 4/30/2013. (nbt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 12-cv-80597-KAM FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. STERLING PRECIOUS METALS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Corporation, KERRY MARSHALL, MATTHEW MEYER, and FRANCIS RYAN ZOFAY, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION'S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE MAY 6, 2013 HEARING This matter is before the court upon Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission's (“FTC”) Motion to appear telephonically at the May 6, 2013 hearing. This court finds as follows: The FTC requests that the Court permit it to appear telephonically at the March hearing scheduled for May 6, 2013, on its Opposition to Nonparty Scott Properties, LLC’s Motion to Quash Subpoena or Alternatively, Motion for Protective Order as to Request Numbers 1, 2, 4, and 6. The Court finds that appearing telephonically would eliminate the FTC’s incursion of travel expenses necessary to send its attorney(s) from 1 Atlanta, Georgia to attend a hearing on the subject motion in West Palm Beach, Florida and would not prejudice any party in this matter. Now therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the FTC's Motion Requesting Permission to Appear at the May 6, 2013 Hearing Telephonically is HEREBY GRANTED. Plaintiff's counsel shall contact Mr. Ken Zuniga, Courtroom Deputy, at (561) 803-3470 at least 24 hours before the hearing to make appropriate arrangements. 30th DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Florida this ____ day of April 2013. ________________________ WILLIAM MATTHEWMAN U.S. Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?