Mercado v. Christian Debt Consolidation, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER granting 27 Motion to Compel. The Court shall reserve ruling as to whether to grant sanctions against Defendants and/or their counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge William Matthewman on 4/30/2013. (nbt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 12-80738-CIV-MARRA/MATTHEWMAN SUSAN MERCADO, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIAN DEBT CONSOLIDATION, INC., a Florida corporation, and ADAM HAYAT, individually, Defendants. ______________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DOCUMENTS AND DEPOSITION TESTIMONY [DE 27] THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff, Susan Mercado’s (“Plaintiff”), Motion to Compel Documents and Deposition Testimony [DE 27]. This matter was referred to the undersigned by United States District Judge Kenneth A. Marra upon an Order referring all discovery to the undersigned for final disposition. See DE 14. Defendants, Christian Debt Consolidation, Inc., and Adam Hayat, responded to Plaintiff=s motion [DE 29]. The matter is now ripe for review and disposition. The Court held a hearing on the motion on April 13, 2013. As stated in open court, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion [DE 27] is GRANTED; 2. The depositions of Mr. Hayat and Ms. Hendrickson shall be continued, and both deponents shall respond to all questions unless their responses would involve attorney-client privileged information; 1 3. Defendants shall turn over all documents responsive to Plaintiff’s Request for Production that have not previously been produced; and 4. The Court shall reserve ruling as to whether to grant sanctions against Defendants and/or their counsel. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, this 30th day of April, 2013. ___________________________________ WILLIAM MATTHEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?