Kadiyala et al v. Pupke et al

Filing 288

ORDER AFFIRMING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 249 Motion for Bill of Costs filed by Ravi Kadiyala, 283 Report and Recommendations; granting 249 Motion for Bill of Costs. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 8/31/2022. See attached document for full details. (ir)

Download PDF
Case 9:17-cv-80732-KAM Document 288 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2022 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 17-80732-CIV-KAM RAVI KADIYALA, individually, and as the Assignee of CREDIT UNION MORTGAGE UTILITY BANC, INC., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. MARK JOHN PUPKE, MARIE MOLLY PUPKE, Defendants. _______________________________________/ MARK JOHN PUPKE and MARIE MOLLY PUPKE, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. RAVI KADIYALA, individually, and as the Assignee of CREDIT UNION MORTGAGE UTILITY BANC, INC. an Illinois corporation, Counterclaim Defendant. _______________________________________/ ORDER AFFIRMING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This cause is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Bill of Costs. (DE 249). This matter was referred to the Honorable William Matthewman, United States Magistrate Judge, Southern District of Florida. A Report and Recommendation, dated August 16, 2022, has been filed. (DE 283.) The Report recommends that the Motion be granted, and Plaintiff be awarded $6,332.77. The Court has conducted an independent de novo review of the file and no objections have been filed. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1) The Report and Recommendation (DE 283) is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. Case 9:17-cv-80732-KAM Document 288 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2022 Page 2 of 2 2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Bill of Costs (DE 249) is GRANTED. 3) The Court will separately enter Judgment for Plaintiff. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 31st day of August, 2022. KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?