Alexander v. School Board of Palm Beach County, Florida

Filing 116

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 114 Report and Recommendations on 104 Motion for Bill of Costs, 105 Motion to Tax Costs; granting in part and denying in part 104 Motion for Bill of Costs; granting in part and denying in p art 105 Motion to Tax Costs; adopting Report and Recommendations re 114 Report and Recommendations on 104 Motion for Bill of Costs, filed by School Board of Palm Beach County, Florida, 105 Motion to Tax Costs filed by School Board of Palm Beach County, Florida. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 1/10/2022. See attached document for full details. (ls)

Case 9:20-cv-80336-AMC Document 116 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2022 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
CASE NO. 20-80336-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart
DR. SHERNETTE ALEXANDER,
v.

Plaintiff,

SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,
Defendant.
________________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Bruce E.
Reinhart recommending that Defendant’s Bill of Taxable Costs [ECF Nos. 104, 105] be granted
in part and denied in part [ECF No. 114]. On September 12, 2021, the Court referred the Bill of
Taxable Costs to Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart for a Report and Recommendation
[ECF No. 107]. On December 13, 2021, Judge Reinhart issued the instant R&R, recommending
that the proposed taxable costs be granted in part and denied in part [ECF No. 114]. The R&R
states that the parties shall file any objections within fourteen days of the date of service of the
R&R [ECF No. 114 p. 4]. No party has filed objections.
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the R&R and the record in this case and is
otherwise fully advised in the premises. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir.
2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review, the Court finds the R&R to be correct. The
Court therefore agrees with the analysis in the R&R and concludes that the Bill of Taxable Costs
should be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART for the reasons set forth therein.

Case 9:20-cv-80336-AMC Document 116 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2022 Page 2 of 2
CASE NO. 20-80336-CIV-CANNON/Reinhart
Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1.

The R&R [ECF No. 114] is ACCEPTED.

2.

Defendant’s Bill of Taxable Costs [ECF Nos. 104, 105] is GRANTED IN PART
AND DENIED IN PART.

3.

Defendant shall recover $2,246.75 in taxable costs.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida this 10th day of January
2022.

cc:

_________________________________
AILEEN M. CANNON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

counsel of record

2