Jones v. Schofield et al

Filing 39

ORDER adopting 31 Report and Recommendations granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Schofield and Ammons are terminated from this action.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 3/30/09 (bjl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : DERRICK SCHOFIELD, Warden, et al., : : Defendants. : ____________________________________: THOMAS CONWAY JONES, 1:08-CV-7 (WLS) ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Hodge, filed February 27, 2009. (Doc. 31). It is recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14) be granted as to Plaintiff's claims under the Prison Rape Elimination Act; granted as to Plaintiff's claims concerning the investigation of his rape; granted as to Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief; and denied as to Plaintiff's claims of needed mental health and medical treatment. Id. No objection has been filed to date. Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. To clarify, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims under the Prison Rape Elimination Act; GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims concerning the investigation of his rape; GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief; and DENIED as to Plaintiff's claims of needed mental health and medical treatment. Therefore, Defendants Schofield and Ammons are hereby ORDERED terminated from this action as defendants. 1 SO ORDERED, this 30th day of March, 2009. /s/W. Louis Sands THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?