Adams v. Georgia Department of Corrections

Filing 25

ORDER granting 11 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 23 Report and Recommendations. Case is dismissed as untimely.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 3/2/2010 (bcl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION JEFFERY ADAMS, JR., : : Petitioner, : : v. : : Sheriff JOHNNY DAUGHERTY and : JAMES E. DONALD, Commissioner, : Georgia Department of Corrections, : : Respondents. : ____________________________________: CASE NO.: 1:08-CV-174 (WLS) ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Claude W. Hicks., Jr., filed November 16, 2009. (Doc. 23). It is recommended that Respondent Commissioner's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) be granted. (Doc. 23 at 1-2). The Report and Recommendation provided the Parties with ten (10) days to file written objections to the recommendations therein. (Id. at 2). The period for objections expired on Friday, November 27, 2009;1 no objections have been filed to date. (See Docket). Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(2), because the actual deadline for filing was Thursday, November 26, 2009, and because that day was the federal holiday of Thanksgiving Day, the deadline was extended to Friday, November 27, 2009. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(2). 1 Respondent Commissioner's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) is GRANTED, and Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED as untimely. SO ORDERED, this 2nd day of March, 2010. /s/ W. Louis Sands _____ THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?