Brown v. Norton

Filing 43

ORDER granting 32 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 42 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 3/8/12 (wks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ALBANY DIVISION
ROBERT LEE BROWN,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO: 1:09-CV-059 (WLS)
:
DETECTIVE JOHN B. NORTON,
:
:
Defendant.
:
____________________________________:
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge
Charles H. Weigle, filed November, 15, 2011. (Doc. 42). It is recommended that Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 32) be granted because there are no genuine issues of
material fact raised by Plaintiff. (See Docs. 1, 3, and 42).
The Report and Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days1 from the
date of its service to file written objections to the recommendations therein. (Id.). The period for
filing objections expired on Friday, December 2, 2011; no objections have been filed to date.
(See Docket). Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said
Report and Recommendation (Doc. 42) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and
made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein.
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 32) is GRANTED; all
Defendants are dismissed from this action.
SO ORDERED, this 8th day of March, 2012.
/s/ W. Louis Sands
THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
The Parties were given an additional three days because service was made by mail. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d)
(adding three days to specified period within which a party may act if service is made under Rule 5(b)(2)(C) by
mailing process to a party’s last known address).
1

1