Williams v. Lockette et al

Filing 4

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 3 Report and Recommendations. Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Mandamus is Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 7/20/2011 (bcl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION KENTROYIA WILLIAMS, : : Petitioner, : : v. : : Chief Judge WILLIE E. LOCKETTE, et al., : : Respondents. : ____________________________________: CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-155 (WLS) ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed June 27, 2011. (Doc. 3). It is recommended that the pro se Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (Doc. 1) be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. (Doc. 3 at 1). No objections were filed within the fourteen-day period provided pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), which objection period expired on July 14, 2011, with application of the prisoner mailbox rule. (See Doc. 3 at 1-2; Docket; Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d)). Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 3) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the pro se Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Mandamus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. SO ORDERED, this 20th day of July, 2011. /s/ W. Louis Sands THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?