Bush v. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital et al

Filing 34

ORDER granting 28 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 33 Report and Recommendations.; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 7/12/2012. (bcl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION KAWASKI L. BUSH, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : GEORGE CAMP and : LYNN CRENSHAW, : : Defendants. : ____________________________________: CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-64 (WLS) ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed June 5, 2012. (Doc. 33). It is recommended that Defendants George Camp’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 28) and Defendant Crenshaw’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) be granted. (Doc. 33 at 1). The Report and Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file written objections to the recommendations therein. (Id. at 11). The period for objections expired on Tuesday, June 19, 2012; no objections have been filed to date. (See Docket). Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Defendants George Camp’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 28) is GRANTED for all claims against Defendant George Camp Sr. in his official and individual capacity and for all claims against Defendant George Camp Jr. in his official and individual capacity. Defendant 1 Crenshaw’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) is also GRANTED and Defendant Crenshaw is hereby DISMISSED from the case. SO ORDERED, this 12th day of July, 2012. /s/ W. Louis Sands THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?