BUTLER v. BellSouth Corporation et al

Filing 15

ORDER correcting a clerical error. The claims against Defendant BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC and not Communication Workers should have been the only claims dismissed. The Court orders the remaining parties - Butler and the Communication Works - to show cause why this case should not be reopened. No response briefs will be permitted. Ordered by U.S. District Judge W. Louis Sands on 11/19/13. (wks)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION BENNIE BUTLER, Plaintiff, : : : v. : : BELLSOUTH : TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC, and : COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS : OF AMERICA LOCAL 3201, : Defendants. : ____________________________________: CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-131 (WLS) ORDER Upon review of the docket, the Court notes that it appears that an entry of judgment was entered as to all defendants by clerical error in the above-captioned case. Based on the Court’s Order, however, the claims against Bellsouth, and not the Communication Workers, should have been the only claims dismissed. Under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a Court may sua sponte correct a clerical error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a). But because the Communication Workers of America Local 3201 have pointed out in a subsequently filed case that the claims against them were due to be dismissed as untimely in any event, Defendant CWA’s Motion to Dismiss, Butler v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC, et al, No. 1:12-cv189 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. May 5, 2013), the Court finds the best course of action is the following. Within fourteen (14) days from the entry of this Order, the remaining Parties—Butler and the Communication Workers—shall show cause why this case should not be reopened. No response briefs will be permitted. SO ORDERED, this 19th day of November, 2013. /s/ W. Louis Sands W. LOUIS SANDS, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?