HELTON v. Baden et al

Filing 44

ORDER granting 28 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 43 Report and Recommendations.; denying 23 Motion for Injunctive Relief. Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 1/31/2013. (bcl)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION RANDY HELTON, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : JOSEPH BADEN, et al., : : Defendants. : ____________________________________: CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-134 (WLS) ORDER Before the Court is a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed January 9, 2013. (Doc. 43.) It is recommended that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 28) be granted and Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief (Doc. 23) be denied. (Doc. 43 at 8, 9.) The Report and Recommendation provided the Parties with fourteen (14) days to file written objections to the recommendations therein. (Id. at 9.) The period for objections expired on Monday, January 28, 2013; no objections have been filed to date. (See Docket.) Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Recommendation (Doc. 43) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 28) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s Motion for Injunctive Relief (Doc. 23) is DENIED. SO ORDERED, this _31st day of January, 2013. /s/ W. Louis Sands THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?