Burks v. ASTRUE
Filing
16
ORDER adopting 15 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff shall take nothing from her complaint and Judgment shall be entered in favor of the Commissioner.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 6/24/13 (jbk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ALBANY DIVISION
MARTHA BURKS,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner
Of Social Security,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-47 (WLS)
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate
Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed June 6, 2013. (Doc. 15.) It is recommended that the
Social Security Commissioner’s final decision be affirmed pursuant to Sentence Four of
§ 405(g), and that Plaintiff’s request for a remand pursuant to Sentence Six of § 405(g)
be denied. (Id. at 5.) No objections were filed within the fourteen-day period provided
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The objection period expired on June 20, 2013. (See
Doc. 15 at 5; Docket).
Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said
Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED,
ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and
reasons stated therein. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff shall
taking nothing by her Complaint (Doc. 1) and JUDGMENT shall be entered in favor of
the Commissioner.
SO ORDERED, this 24th day of June, 2013.
/s/ W. Louis Sands__________________
THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?