Burks v. ASTRUE

Filing 16

ORDER adopting 15 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff shall take nothing from her complaint and Judgment shall be entered in favor of the Commissioner.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 6/24/13 (jbk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION MARTHA BURKS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Of Social Security, Defendant. : : : : : : : : : : : CASE NO.: 1:12-CV-47 (WLS) ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed June 6, 2013. (Doc. 15.) It is recommended that the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision be affirmed pursuant to Sentence Four of § 405(g), and that Plaintiff’s request for a remand pursuant to Sentence Six of § 405(g) be denied. (Id. at 5.) No objections were filed within the fourteen-day period provided pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The objection period expired on June 20, 2013. (See Doc. 15 at 5; Docket). Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff shall taking nothing by her Complaint (Doc. 1) and JUDGMENT shall be entered in favor of the Commissioner. SO ORDERED, this 24th day of June, 2013. /s/ W. Louis Sands__________________ THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?