PRICE v. DOE et al
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 7 Report and Recommendations. Nurse Crimshaw is dismissed from Plaintiff's Complaint and Plaintiff may proceed only against Dr. Klauburg and Ms. P. Davis. Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 9/26/2013. (bcl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
RANDY LEE PRICE,
Dr. KLAUBURG, Ms. P. DAVIS,
and Dr. JOHN DOE 2,
Before the Court is a Recommendation of Dismissal from United States
Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed February 15, 2013.
recommended that Plaintiff’s Complaint (Docs. 1, 6) brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
1983 be dismissed as against Nurse Crimshaw for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 7 at 5.)
Judge Langstaff recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint be permitted to proceed against
Dr. Klauburg and Ms. P. Davis. (Id.) No objections were filed within the fourteen-day
period provided pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The objection period expired on
March 1, 2013. (See Doc. 7 at 5; Docket).
Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said
Recommendation (Doc. 7) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and
made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein.
Accordingly, Nurse Crimshaw is DISMISSED from Plaintiff’s Complaint (Docs. 1, 6),
and Plaintiff may proceed only against Dr. Klauburg and Ms. P. Davis.
SO ORDERED, this _26th day of September, 2013.
/s/ W. Louis Sands__________________
THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?