PHILLIPS v. Jeanes et al
Filing
30
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 20 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed as to Warden Jeanes. Plaintiff may proceed with his Complaint against Officers Richardson, Curry, and Lewis. Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 10/7/2013. (bcl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ALBANY DIVISION
MICHAEL WADE PHILLIPS,
Plaintiff,
v.
Warden J. JEANES, et. al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
1:13-CV-68 (WLS)
ORDER
Before the Court is a Recommendation of Dismissal from United States
Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed September 13, 2013. (Doc. 20.) Plaintiff
filed the above-captioned matter pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Judge Langstaff
recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 15) be dismissed against Warden Jeanes
and be permitted to proceed against Officers Richardson, Curry, and Lewis.
No
objections were filed within the fourteen-day period provided pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1). The objection period expired on September 27, 2013. (See Doc. 20 at 4-5;
Docket).
Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said
Recommendation of Dismissal (Doc. 20) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED,
ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and
reasons stated therein. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 15) is DISMISSED as
against Warden Jeanes. Plaintiff may proceed with his Complaint against Officers
Richardson, Curry, and Lewis.
SO ORDERED, this 7th day of October, 2013.
1
/s/ W. Louis Sands
THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?