DUNSTON v. CARTER et al

Filing 21

ORDER granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 20 Report and Recommendations.Ordered by U.S. District Judge W LOUIS SANDS on 5/22/14 (wks)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ALBANY DIVISION
DONALD WARREN DUNSTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
NURSE PRACTITIONER BROWN,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CASE NO.: 1:13-cv-103 (WLS)

ORDER
Before the Court is a Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge
Thomas Q. Langstaff in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case. (Doc. 20.) In the Recommendation,
Judge Langstaff recommends that the Court grant Defendant Brown’s motion for summary judgment. Despite notice of the procedure for motions for summary judgment,
Dunston did not respond to the motion. Nor did he object to the Recommendation. Upon full review and consideration of the record, the Court finds that Judge Langstaff’s
Recommendation should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. The motion
for summary judgment is GRANTED, and judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant.
SO ORDERED, this

22nd

day of May, 2014.

/s/ W. Louis Sands
W. LOUIS SANDS, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1