HALL v. COOL, et al
Filing
13
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 6 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE are hereby DISMISSED. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant GARY COOL shall go forward.Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 9/14/11 (lap)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATHENS DIVISION
RICARDO ALEXANDER HALL,
Plaintiff,
Sergeant GARY COOL and the OCONEE
CO. SHERIFF’S OFFICE,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civil Action
No. 3:11‐cv‐99 (CAR)
Defendants.
____________________________________
ORDER ON RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge=s Recommendation [Doc. 6]
to dismiss Plaintiff=s claims against Defendant OCONEE COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE
because it is not a legal entity subject to suit. Plaintiff has not entered an objection to the
Recommendation. Upon review of the Recommendation and consideration of
Plaintiff=s Complaint, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United
States Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is therefore ADOPTED and MADE
THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Plaintiff=s claims against Defendant OCONEE
COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE are hereby DISMISSED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. '
1915(e)(2). In accordance with the Order and Recommendation, Plaintiff=s claims
against Defendant GARY COOL shall go forward.
1
It is SO ORDERED this 14th day of September, 2011.
S/ C. Ashley Royal
C. ASHLEY ROYAL, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SSH
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?