BRUCE v. FANNIE MAE et al

Filing 26

ORDER granting 20 Motion to Dismiss Complaint; finding as moot 21 Motion to Stay. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 11/08/2012. (CGC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION RHONDA BRUCE, * Plaintiff, * vs. * CASE NO. 3:12-CV-90(CDL) FANNIE MAE, CHASE HOME FINANCE, * LLC, LUCY CROSS, RESTON, INC., REALAWARE, LLC, L REALTY, INC. * and RHONDA SHEA, * Defendants. * O R D E R Plaintiff Rhonda Bruce (“Bruce”) alleges that Defendants committed various Georgia state law torts against her, including trespass, infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy, trover, conversion, and wrongful dispossession. Bruce asserts that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) (“§ 1332”). Compl. ¶ 2, ECF No. 1. For the Court to have subject matter jurisdiction under § 1332, there must be “complete diversity” among the parties, which means that “the citizenship of every plaintiff must be diverse from the citizenship of every defendant.” 1320 n.2 (11th Cir. 2005). Legg v. Wyeth, 428 F.3d 1317, Here, however, Bruce did not allege that there is complete diversity among the parties. Rather, Bruce alleges that she is a citizen of Georgia and that the following Defendants are citizens of Georgia: Ronda Shea, Reston, Inc., Realaware, LLC, Lucy Cross, and L Realty, Inc. Compl. ¶¶ 1(a), (d)-(g). Given that Bruce has not alleged that there is complete diversity of citizenship in this action, the Court exercise subject matter jurisdiction under § 1332. not assert another basis for federal jurisdiction cannot Bruce did over her claims, and a review of her Complaint reveals that her claims all arise under Georgia state law, not federal law. reasons, the Court grants Defendant Fannie Mae’s For these Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (ECF No. 20). Fannie Mae’s Motion to Stay Discovery and Pretrial Deadlines (ECF No. 21) is moot. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 8th day of November, 2012. S/Clay D. Land CLAY D. LAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?