KALPAK v. CITIBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al

Filing 3

ORDER dismissing appeal. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 07/10/2012. (aaf) ***

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION ARA F. KALPAK, * Appellant, * vs. * CITIBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, * CASE NO. 3:12-MC-4 APPELLEE. * O R D E R In the underlying bankruptcy proceeding, the Bankruptcy Judge granted Appellee Citibank National Association relief from stay on April 27, 2012. Stay, Order Granting Mot. for Relief from Citibank, N.A. v. Kalpak (In re Kalpak), No. 12-30456 (JPS) (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Apr. 27, 2012), Bankr. ECF No. 25. That Order was docketed on April 30, 2012, id., and on May 14, 2012, pro se Appellant Ara Kalpak filed a timely Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 1). Appellant, however, failed to pay the requisite filing fee when filing the Notice of Appeal. 8001(a) (a Notice prescribed fee”). of Appeal shall See Fed. R. Bankr. P. be “accompanied by the Further, Appellant failed to file the record on appeal, issues to be presented, and designation of items within fourteen days of filing the Notice of Appeal as required by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8006. On June 19, 2012, the Court ordered “Appellant to show cause within fourteen days . . . as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to follow the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure regarding timely payment of a filing fee and timely filing of the required documentation.” June 19, 2012 Order 2, ECF No. 2. As of the date of this Order, Appellant has not responded to the Court’s show cause Order and has not complied with the requirements dismisses for this pursuing appeal for an appeal. failure to Therefore, prosecute, the Court failure to follow the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and failure to obey the Court’s Order. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 10th day of July, 2012. S/Clay D. Land CLAY D. LAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?