KALPAK v. CITIBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
Filing
3
ORDER dismissing appeal. Ordered by Judge Clay D. Land on 07/10/2012. (aaf) ***
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
ATHENS DIVISION
ARA F. KALPAK,
*
Appellant,
*
vs.
*
CITIBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
*
CASE NO. 3:12-MC-4
APPELLEE.
*
O R D E R
In
the
underlying
bankruptcy
proceeding,
the
Bankruptcy
Judge granted Appellee Citibank National Association relief from
stay on April 27, 2012.
Stay,
Order Granting Mot. for Relief from
Citibank, N.A. v. Kalpak (In re Kalpak), No. 12-30456
(JPS) (Bankr. M.D. Ga. Apr. 27, 2012), Bankr. ECF No. 25.
That
Order was docketed on April 30, 2012, id., and on May 14, 2012,
pro se Appellant Ara Kalpak filed a timely Notice of Appeal (ECF
No. 1).
Appellant, however, failed to pay the requisite filing
fee when filing the Notice of Appeal.
8001(a)
(a
Notice
prescribed fee”).
of
Appeal
shall
See Fed. R. Bankr. P.
be
“accompanied
by
the
Further, Appellant failed to file the record
on appeal, issues to be presented,
and designation of items
within fourteen days of filing the Notice of Appeal as required
by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8006.
On June 19, 2012,
the Court ordered “Appellant to show cause within fourteen days
. . . as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure
to follow the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure regarding
timely payment of a filing fee and timely filing of the required
documentation.”
June 19, 2012 Order 2, ECF No. 2.
As of the date of this Order, Appellant has not responded
to the Court’s show cause Order and has not complied with the
requirements
dismisses
for
this
pursuing
appeal
for
an
appeal.
failure
to
Therefore,
prosecute,
the
Court
failure
to
follow the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and failure to
obey the Court’s Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 10th day of July, 2012.
S/Clay D. Land
CLAY D. LAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?