HALLFORD v. COLVIN

Filing 16

ORDER granting 15 Motion to Remand; finding as moot 12 Motion to Remand. This case is remanded to the Commissioner under sentence four for additional proceedings consistent with this Order. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE STEPHEN HYLES on 7-6-15 (mpm)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION GREGORY HALLFORD, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:15-CV-00006-MSH ORDER Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the government’s request to remand this action for further development of the record by an administrative law judge (ALJ), this case is hereby remanded. On remand, the ALJ will: 1) further evaluate the evidence and record, including reviewing the subsequent award; 2) fully evaluate claimant’s medically determinable impairments at steps two and three of the sequential evaluation process and provide specific findings regarding Plaintiff’s mental functioning using the special technique in accordance with agency policy; 3) reconsider Plaintiff’s maximum residual functional capacity (RFC) and specifically cite to the evidence of record in support of assessed limitations and fully evaluate all opinion evidence from medical sources; and 5) reconsider Plaintiff’s history of work activity and any ability to return to past relevant work at the skilled level. Therefore, this Court hereby grants the Commissioner’s motion (ECF No. 15), denies Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 12) as moot, and reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). The clerk of the court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED, this 6th day of July, 2015. /s/ Stephen Hyles United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?