WATKINS v. COLVIN

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING 1 Motion for Extension of Time; TERMINATING 9 Motion to Stay; and GRANTING 12 Motion to Remand. The clerk of the court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 1/29/2016. (tlh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION ROSE MARIE WATKINS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ____________________________________ : : : : : : : : : : CASE NO. 3:15-cv-90-CAR-MSH Social Security Appeal ORDER Pursuant to sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Commissioner’s request for remand (ECF No. 12), this Court reverses the Commissioner’s decision and remands this action for further administrative proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991). Upon remand, the Appeals Council will set aside its dismissal dated July 10, 2015 and reconsider the claimant’s Request for Review in accordance with agency policy. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a social security appeal (ECF No. 1) is granted and her motion to stay (ECF No. 9) is terminated as moot. The motion to remand (ECF No. 12) is granted. The clerk of the court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED this 29th day of January, 2016. S/ C. Ashley Royal C. ASHLEY ROYAL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?